Applying a Sustainable Transportation Hierarchy

To be equitable and efficient, transportation planning must apply a sustainable transportation hierarchy that prioritizes affordable, healthy, and resource-efficient mobility options.

4 minute read

January 8, 2024, 8:00 AM PST

By Todd Litman


Low shot of pedestrians and a bike crossing a striped crosswalk.

trattieritratti / Adobe Stock

Many common planning practices are biased in ways that favor faster travel—and therefore automobile travel—over slower but more affordable, inclusive, healthy, and resource-efficient modes. For example, conventional indicators, such as roadway level-of-service (LOS) and hours of congestion delay evaluate performance based on traffic speeds and give little priority to other goals. In addition, roads and parking facilities have dedicated funding while sidewalks, bikeways, and public transit services must compete for funds with other public expenditures. As a result, most communities underinvest in non-auto modes. This creates automobile-dependent communities where it is difficult to get around without a car.

There are ways to correct these biases to create more equitable and efficient transport systems. Some jurisdictions have vehicle travel reduction targets, and policies to achieve them. For example, British Columbia, where I live, has targets to reduce light-duty vehicle travel by 25 percent and double non-auto trips by 2030. California has targets to reduce per capita light-duty VMT by 25 percent by 2030 and 30 percent by 2045, and requires planning decisions to be consistent with those targets. Colorado has similar rules. Minnesota has a target to reduce vehicle travel by 14 percent by 2040 and 20 percent by 2050.

Another approach is to apply a sustainable transportation hierarchy, which gives priority to affordable, inclusive, and resource-efficient modes. The image below illustrates this concept.

Sustainable Transportation Hierarchy

Sustainable Transportation Hierarchy
A sustainable transportation hierarchy favors affordable, inclusive, and resource-efficient modes. This inverts conventional transportation planning priorities.

There are many variations of this illustration. The image below by the Institute for Sensible Transport shows why these priorities are justified: walking, bicycling, and public transport require less space and create less pollution than automobile travel. This could be expanded to include other factors such as user costs, road and parking infrastructure costs, crash risks imposed on other people, and health impacts.

Sustainable transportation hierarchy

Sustainable Transportation Hierarchy (https://earthbound.report/2018/10/15/the-hierarchy-of-sustainable-transport )

A sustainable transportation hierarchy can be applied to various types of planning decisions.

Funding allocation

Sustainable transport planning spends less on roadway expansions and parking subsidies and more on walking, bicycling, and public transport improvements. This is a major change. Currently, less than 10 percent of transportation infrastructure funding is spent on sustainable modes, which is less than their portion of total trips, crashes, users, and potential trips, as illustrated below.

Non-auto infrastructure spending versus demand indicators    

Non-auto Infrastructure Spending Versus Demand Indicators
Less than 10% of infrastructure spending is currently devoted to non-auto modes, which is smaller than their share of total trips, traffic deaths, potential trips, or users.

Roadway design

A sustainable transportation hierarchy can also be applied to roadway design and road space allocation. This is consistent with Complete Streets policies that prioritize the safety and mobility of all users instead of the speed of cars and flow of traffic.

Let me illustrate. I recently visited Hong Kong, one of the world’s densest and most multimodal cities. Only a small portion of total trips in that city are by car, particularly in central neighborhoods such as Kowloon and Wan Chai where we stayed. Yet, the majority of road right-of-way was devoted to vehicle traffic and parking. As a result, the sidewalks were crowded and uncomfortable, and crossing streets was slow and sometimes dangerous, as illustrated below. There are few bikeways and bicycling is difficult, so bicycling is much less common than would be optimal.

Crowded Hong Kong sidewalks
Hong Kong sidewalks are often crowded with pedestrians while the majority of road rights-of-way are dedicated to vehicle traffic and parking.
Hong Kong is crowded with pedestrians.
Although most downtown trips are by walking, sidewalks are narrow and poorly maintained.
Walking is the most common mode share in central Hong Kong.
Hong Kong would be more efficient and livable if it devoted more space and money to pedestrian and bicycle facilities.

Unfortunately, Hong Kong is not unique; most city streets are designed to favor motor vehicle travel to the detriment of walking and bicycling. A sustainable transportation hierarchy devotes more road space to walking and bicycling, including wider sidewalks, better crosswalks, and plenty of bikeways.

Land development patterns

A sustainable transportation hierarchy can also be applied to land use development patterns. It favors Smart Growth development policies that create more compact, mixed, and transit-oriented communities, so travel distances are shorter and more destinations are accessible by sustainable modes.

Nashville Area Walkscore Map
This heat map shows Walk Score ratings in the Nashville area. Walk Scores increase with development density and mix. A sustainable transportation hierarchy supports that type of development.

A sustainable transportation hierarchy also reforms parking policies so non-drivers are no longer forced to pay for costly parking spaces they don't need. This reduces the number of parking spaces needed to serve motorists’ demands, freeing up urban space and funding for sustainable infrastructure.

Traffic speed and management

A sustainable transportation hierarchy can also apply to traffic speed and management decisions. For example, walking and bicycling require low speeds for safety and comfort. Micromodes (e-bikes and e-scooters) can travel a little faster, and urban buses can operate somewhat faster. Motorists expect higher speeds and transportation planners traditionally design streets and roads to accommodate them, although that is dangerous and uncomfortable for sustainable modes. For sustainability, slower is better!

Optimal facility design speed by mode

Optimal Design Speeds

Miles per Hour (Kms per Hour)

Active modes (walking and bicycling)

3-12 (5-20)

Micromodes (e-bikes and e-scooters)

10-15 (15-25)

Urban bus

20-30 (30-50)

Automobiles

40+ (65+)

A sustainable transportation hierarchy favors lower roadway design speeds to make walking, bicycling and public transit safer and more comfortable.

Current demographic and economic trends are causing automobile travel to peak and increasing demand for non-auto travel. A sustainable transportation hierarchy responds to those changes by favoring affordable, inclusive, and resource-efficient modes. This benefits everybody, including motorists who experience less traffic and parking congestion, increased safety, and reduced chauffeuring burdens. 

To optimize transportation, planners should prioritize affordability, social equity, inclusivity, health, safety, livability, and environmental quality with a sustainable transportation hierarchy.


Todd Litman

Todd Litman is founder and executive director of the Victoria Transport Policy Institute, an independent research organization dedicated to developing innovative solutions to transport problems. His work helps to expand the range of impacts and options considered in transportation decision-making, improve evaluation methods, and make specialized technical concepts accessible to a larger audience. His research is used worldwide in transport planning and policy analysis.

portrait of professional woman

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban Planner

Get top-rated, practical training

Close-up of "Apartment for rent" sign in red text on black background in front of blurred building

Trump Administration Could Effectively End Housing Voucher Program

Federal officials are eyeing major cuts to the Section 8 program that helps millions of low-income households pay rent.

April 21, 2025 - Housing Wire

Logo for Planetizen Federal Action Tracker with black and white image of U.S. Capitol with water ripple overlay.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

April 23, 2025 - Diana Ionescu

Black and white photos of camp made up of small 'earthquake shacks' in Dolores Park in 1906 after the San Francisco earthquake.

The 120 Year Old Tiny Home Villages That Sheltered San Francisco’s Earthquake Refugees

More than a century ago, San Francisco mobilized to house thousands of residents displaced by the 1906 earthquake. Could their strategy offer a model for the present?

April 15, 2025 - Charles F. Bloszies

Millbrae BART station.

HSR Reaches Key Settlement in Northern California City

The state’s high-speed rail authority reached an agreement with Millbrae, a key city on the train’s proposed route to San Francisco.

April 24 - San Diego Post

Spiral ramp on exterior of parking garage in downtown Spokane, Washington.

Washington State Legislature Passes Parking Reform Bill

A bill that would limit parking requirements for new developments is headed to the governor’s desk.

April 24 - OPB

Missouri state capitol dome in Jefferson City, MO.

Missouri Law Would Ban Protections for Housing Voucher Users

A state law seeks to overturn source-of-income discrimination bans passed by several Missouri cities.

April 24 - Missouri Independent

Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools

This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.

Planning for Universal Design

Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.

Write for Planetizen