Forget red state versus blue state: a new data analysis and mapping project by The New York Times shows that the political divides in the country can be mapped to the neighborhood level within metropolitan areas.

Emily Badger, Kevin Quealy, and Josh Katz present an info-graphic-rich data journalism feature that reveals the partisan divides evident in the geography of the United States—in far greater detail than the red-blue and urban-rural divide that is already searingly rendered on so many elections maps. The big surprise of this exercise: the partisan dive of U.S. communities is visible at the local level, within urban areas.
"Democrats and Republicans live apart from each other, down to the neighborhood, to a degree that raises provocative questions about how closely lifestyle preferences have become aligned with politics and how even neighbors may influence one another," according to the article.
The analysis is made possible by analyzing the individual addresses for 180 million registered voters. The data reveals that "nearly all American voters live in communities where they are less likely to encounter people with opposing politics than we’d expect."
Maps of Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas, and New York top the article, but the same patterns are visible in Atlanta, Baltimore, Austin, Indianapolis, Boston, Cincinnati, Charlotte, Detroit, Birmingham, Columbus, Denver, Houston, and more.
As for what explains these patterns, the article suggest that geographic alignment follows educational realignment,"with the changes concentrated in highly educated suburbs and more working-class towns and rural communities." Racial segregation also plays a factor in partisan clustering, according to the article. "African-American voters in particular are overwhelmingly Democratic and also residentially segregated (metro Milwaukee’s map of partisan segregation, for one, resembles its map of racial segregation)."
A lot more analysis on both cause and effect is included in the source article.
FULL STORY: A Close-Up Picture of Partisan Segregation, Among 180 Million Voters

What ‘The Brutalist’ Teaches Us About Modern Cities
How architecture and urban landscapes reflect the trauma and dysfunction of the post-war experience.

‘Complete Streets’ Webpage Deleted in Federal Purge
Basic resources and information on building bike lanes and sidewalks, formerly housed on the government’s Complete Streets website, are now gone.

Downtown Los Angeles on the Rise: A Promising 2025
Fueled by new developments, cultural investments, and a growing dining scene, downtown Los Angeles is poised for significant growth in 2025, despite challenges from recent wildfires and economic uncertainties.

Supporting Indigenous Land Reclamation Through Design
Harvard students collaborated with the Sac and Fox Nation to develop strategies for reclaiming and co-managing ancestral lands in Illinois, supporting Indigenous sovereignty through design, cultural storytelling, and economic planning.

A Plan to Expand Tree Canopy Across Dayton
Dayton is developing an urban forest master plan, using a $2 million grant to expand its tree canopy, address decades of tree loss, and enhance environmental equity across the city.

Decarbonizing Homes: The Case for Electrifying Residential Heating
A new MIT study finds that transitioning residential heating from natural gas to electric heat pumps can significantly reduce carbon emissions and operational costs.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies
Mpact (formerly Rail~Volution)
Chaddick Institute at DePaul University
City of Piedmont, CA
Great Falls Development Authority, Inc.
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research