Freedom to Move: Investing in Transportation Choices for a Clean, Prosperous, and Just Future

This Union of Concerned Scientists study examines why and how to improve resource-efficient travel options to achieve diverse goals. It estimates that more efficient transport could save up to $201 billion in energy and $128 billion in health costs.

2 minute read

December 9, 2024, 5:00 AM PST

By Todd Litman


Busy subway station with people walking on platform and train stopped.

Pavel Losevsky / Adobe Stock

The new Union of Concerned Scientists study, Freedom to Move: Investing in Transportation Choices for a Clean, Prosperous, and Just Future, shows that a transportation system that gives everyone more transportation choices will be more equitable, save trillions of dollars, and fight climate change. More transportation options such as transit, walking and biking are good for the environment, economy, and social equity.  

It finds that:

  • A system with improved transportation options and reduced driving could save up to $201 billion in energy infrastructure and $128 billion in public health costs through 2050, presenting a more effective climate solution than the current car-dependent model.

  • The auto and oil industries have a vested interest in car dependence, currently receiving more than 75 percent of public and private transportation spending and have lobbied for decades to prioritize cars over a more complete and affordable set of transportation options.

  • Science-based policies that prioritize more transportation choices align with community-based solutions where local advocates have long fought for a transportation system that prioritizes people over industry interests.

Freedom to Move (https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/freedom-move)
During the last century, transportation spending dramatically increased with investment in highways greatly exceeding that of transit.

Recommendations

  • Invest in a complete set of transportation options for a system that offers abundant access to everywhere we need to go and promotes economically thriving communities in both urban and rural areas. This means investing in networks of safe sidewalks for pedestrians, paths for biking and micromobility, and frequent, wide-ranging, affordable, and clean public transportation. These efforts depend on promoting land use changes that allow people to live near high-quality transit without displacement, dismantling structural racism in community safety, and ensuring good jobs with high labor standards.

  • Prioritize transportation projects in rational ways, including the extent to which they help achieve climate goals, reduce harm to communities experiencing the greatest impacts, and improve access for those who need it the most. This will necessarily mean meeting more rigorous standards for expensive, high-polluting highway expansion projects that commit us to high maintenance costs. Instead, we must first address the backlog of existing infrastructure maintenance. Also, state departments of transportation and metropolitan planning organizations must be accountable and transparent in their decisionmaking on what gets built.

Freedom to Move (https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/freedom-move)
Automobile costs dominates U.S. transportation spending.
  • Make transportation decision-making processes representative, and meaningfully engage the people and communities most affected by proposed projects. For decades, the auto, fossil fuel, and road-building industries have profited from excessive highway expansion and denied us choice in transportation. All of us, whether Black, brown, or White, whether US-born or immigrant, deserve to have a seat at the table to ensure transportation projects truly benefit our communities.

 

Friday, December 6, 2024 in Freedom to Move: Investing in Transportation Choices for a Clean, Prosperous, and Just Future

portrait of professional woman

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban Planner

Get top-rated, practical training

Bird's eye view of manufactured home park.

Manufactured Crisis: Losing the Nation’s Largest Source of Unsubsidized Affordable Housing

Manufactured housing communities have long been an affordable housing option for millions of people living in the U.S., but that affordability is disappearing rapidly. How did we get here?

March 25, 2025 - Shelterforce

U-Haul truck on road with blurred grassy roadside in background.

Americans May Be Stuck — But Why?

Americans are moving a lot less than they once did, and that is a problem. While Yoni Applebaum, in his highly-publicized article Stuck, gets the reasons badly wrong, it's still important to ask: why are we moving so much less than before?

March 27, 2025 - Alan Mallach

Close-up of rear car bumper in traffic on freeway.

Research Shows More Roads = More Driving

A national study shows, once again, that increasing road supply induces additional vehicle travel, particularly over the long run.

March 23, 2025 - Road Capacity as a Fundamental Determinant of Vehicle Travel

Two white and red Stadler electric Caltrain trains next to each other on a sunny day.

Which US Rail Agencies Are Buying Zero-Emissions Trains?

U.S. rail agencies are slowly making the shift to zero-emissions trains, which can travel longer distances without refueling and reduce air pollution.

March 30 - Smart Cities Dive

Front of San Diego High School with students milling around.

San Diego School District Approves Affordable Housing Plan

The district plans to build workforce housing for 10 percent of its employees in the next decade and explore other ways to contribute to housing development.

March 30 - The San Diego Union-Tribune

Red crane in foreground with New York City skyline in background.

Lawsuit Aims to Stop NYC’s ‘City of Yes’ Zoning Reforms

A lawsuit brought by local lawmakers and community groups claims the plan failed to conduct a comprehensive environmental review.

March 30 - New York Post