A new analysis form the Pew Charitable Trusts showed a 20 percent reduction in state spending on transportation between 2002 and 2011, compared to a 4 percent drop from the federal government over the same period.
As written in Governing by Daniel Vock, a recent analysis on transportation funding throughout the last decade by the Pew Charitable Trusts illuminated the shifts in federal and state spending. While federal funding usually receives the brunt of criticism as an unreliable partner for funding, in fact, states are also to blame in their drop of transportation spending over the last decade.
As the report discusses, between 2007 and 2011, "average annual spending on highway and transit nationwide was $207 billion. Of that total, $82 billion, or 40 percent, came from states; $74 billion, or 36 percent, from localities; and $51 billion, or 25 percent, from the federal government."
According to the Vock, the federal government's average spending figures "are higher in part because it was still spending some $13 billion in stimulus money on transportation in 2011. Without the money from the recovery package, federal spending would have dropped by 25 percent between 2002 and 2011. The biggest reason for the spending drop at both levels was a decrease in buying power from fuel taxes."
The federal government relies on this fuel tax for maintaining and funding most of the country's transportation infrastructure, but expenditures have been outpacing revenues for the last decade. As Vock writes, "states are only in a slightly better position. They rely on vehicle taxes for a fifth of their road funding, but those revenues, too, have been falling. Pew suggested that declining vehicle ownership may be one reason those taxes dropped by $8 billion, or 21 percent, in the decade leading up to 2012."
Coupled with the decline in fuel tax revenues, "the cost of road construction increased by 60 percent between 2002 and 2012, meaning the dollars states and the federal government collected did not stretch as far."
FULL STORY: States Are Actually Driving Transportation Funding Declines

What ‘The Brutalist’ Teaches Us About Modern Cities
How architecture and urban landscapes reflect the trauma and dysfunction of the post-war experience.

‘Complete Streets’ Webpage Deleted in Federal Purge
Basic resources and information on building bike lanes and sidewalks, formerly housed on the government’s Complete Streets website, are now gone.

Downtown Los Angeles on the Rise: A Promising 2025
Fueled by new developments, cultural investments, and a growing dining scene, downtown Los Angeles is poised for significant growth in 2025, despite challenges from recent wildfires and economic uncertainties.

San Francisco Slow Streets Bucks Citywide Trend, Reducing Injuries by 61 Percent
Low-cost interventions aimed at slowing traffic are making a major impact on road safety.

How Single-Family Conversions Benefit Both Homeowners and Cities
Converting single-family homes to triplexes can ease the housing crisis and offer affordable, flexible options for more households. Why is it largely illegal?

Report: Transportation Equity Requires More Than Electrification
Lower-income households often lack the resources to buy electric cars, signaling a need for a more holistic approach to improving mobility and lowering transportation costs.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies
Mpact (formerly Rail~Volution)
Chaddick Institute at DePaul University
City of Piedmont, CA
Great Falls Development Authority, Inc.
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research