While the neighborhoods on northern segments of the Atlanta's BeltLine has received 94 percent of funding invested towards parks and trails, segments to the south have received 86 percent of affordable housing investments.
A year-old report titled "An Atlanta BeltLine for All: Equitable Development Assessment" [pdf] was recently discussed on SaportaReport by David Pendered. The study was sponsored by the Atlanta BeltLine Partnership, funded by the Ford Foundation, and conducted by Nexus Research Group and Davidson Consulting. According to Pendered, "the Atlanta City Council created the plan in 2008, after public outcry over three significant acquisitions for the BeltLine in and adjacent to northeast Atlanta."
The findings of the report discuss resource allocation and investments made in the trails, parks, general corridor, and affordable housing within the five quadrants of the 22-mile BeltLine project, among other things. In the context of investment, Pendered highlights how "the BeltLine’s southwest area has received 5.5 percent of the total funds invested in BeltLine parks and trails, according to figures in the report. The actual investment is $7 million out of a total investment, as of the date of the report, of $126.8 million."
In addition, there is a vast difference between investment in affordable housing and investment in trails. Of the total $19.2 million invested in trails, "$12.9 million has been invested in the northeast and northside study areas and $6.3 million has been invested in southwest and southeast Atlanta." Indeed, most of the affordable housing is clustered in these southeast and southwest quadrants, 117 units have been funded there out of the total 131 at the time of the report's creation.
Much of the BeltLine's rhetoric has described it as a way to address the historic inequalities that exist in Atlanta along race and class lines.
FULL STORY: Atlanta BeltLine: North gets parks, trails; South gets affordable housing, according to little known report

What ‘The Brutalist’ Teaches Us About Modern Cities
How architecture and urban landscapes reflect the trauma and dysfunction of the post-war experience.

‘Complete Streets’ Webpage Deleted in Federal Purge
Basic resources and information on building bike lanes and sidewalks, formerly housed on the government’s Complete Streets website, are now gone.

Downtown Los Angeles on the Rise: A Promising 2025
Fueled by new developments, cultural investments, and a growing dining scene, downtown Los Angeles is poised for significant growth in 2025, despite challenges from recent wildfires and economic uncertainties.

San Francisco Slow Streets Bucks Citywide Trend, Reducing Injuries by 61 Percent
Low-cost interventions aimed at slowing traffic are making a major impact on road safety.

How Single-Family Conversions Benefit Both Homeowners and Cities
Converting single-family homes to triplexes can ease the housing crisis and offer affordable, flexible options for more households. Why is it largely illegal?

Report: Transportation Equity Requires More Than Electrification
Lower-income households often lack the resources to buy electric cars, signaling a need for a more holistic approach to improving mobility and lowering transportation costs.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies
Mpact (formerly Rail~Volution)
Chaddick Institute at DePaul University
City of Piedmont, CA
Great Falls Development Authority, Inc.
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research