As the full extent of the instability of Toronto's elevated Gardiner Expressway, and the city's apparent cover-up of the information, becomes clear, the new chief planner has weighed in on what the priorities should be in addressing the problem.

The signs of the Gardiner's fialing health have been raining down on Toronto's streets for some time. After at least seven incidents of falling-concrete this year, and a recent Toronto Star investigation that showed "the crumbling highway is in a state far worse than city staff previously told the public," the city's new chief planner Jennifer Keesmaat has waded into the debate over the future of Toronto's main commuter artery, reports Robyn Doolittle.
With reports indicating that, "[w]ithout half a billion dollars in emergency repair work to the deck, nearly half of the elevated portions of the Gardiner could be structurally unsafe within a decade," Keesmaat said "she is opposed to spending massive sums on infrastructure focused on 'moving more cars,'” and instead, "believes tax dollars are better spent on improving public transit."
"Keesmaat, who has been in the job less than six months, said she wants to immediately resume an environmental assessment that was quietly shelved after Mayor Rob Ford’s election," notes Doolittle. "That study was supposed to provide a cost-benefit analysis of tearing down versus maintaining the structure."
Writing in Spacing Toronto, Ken Greenberg sees the deterioration of the expressway as an opportunity for the city to engage in a serious discussion about "a more sustainable balance of mobility options."
"At a certain point," he says, "the cost and difficulty of maintaining or in our case entirely rebuilding these structures raises the question of whether it makes sense to keep them. Rather than replacement, the decaying infrastructure can be modified or altered to become one that favours more environmentally sound means of getting around harmonizes with a more productive city form."
FULL STORY: Gardiner Expressway: Chief planner wants to resurrect cost/benefit study

What ‘The Brutalist’ Teaches Us About Modern Cities
How architecture and urban landscapes reflect the trauma and dysfunction of the post-war experience.

‘Complete Streets’ Webpage Deleted in Federal Purge
Basic resources and information on building bike lanes and sidewalks, formerly housed on the government’s Complete Streets website, are now gone.

The VW Bus is Back — Now as an Electric Minivan
Volkswagen’s ID. Buzz reimagines its iconic Bus as a fully electric minivan, blending retro design with modern technology, a 231-mile range, and practical versatility to offer a stylish yet functional EV for the future.

Healing Through Parks: Altadena’s Path to Recovery After the Eaton Fire
In the wake of the Eaton Fire, Altadena is uniting to restore Loma Alta Park, creating a renewed space for recreation, community gathering, and resilience.

San Diego to Rescind Multi-Unit ADU Rule
The city wants to close a loophole that allowed developers to build apartment buildings on single-family lots as ADUs.

Electric Vehicles for All? Study Finds Disparities in Access and Incentives
A new UCLA study finds that while California has made progress in electric vehicle adoption, disadvantaged communities remain underserved in EV incentives, ownership, and charging access, requiring targeted policy changes to advance equity.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
City of Albany
UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies
Mpact (formerly Rail~Volution)
Chaddick Institute at DePaul University
City of Piedmont, CA
Great Falls Development Authority, Inc.
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research