Funding Biden's Infrastructure Plan: Should Users or Corporations Pay?

After determining the size and scope of President Biden's infrastructure package, the next biggest challenge is determining how to pay for it. The partisan divide is steep, but Roll Call exposes division within the Democrats' ranks.

5 minute read

May 25, 2021, 9:00 AM PDT

By Irvin Dawid


Bay Bridge Toll

Ann Baldwin / Shutterstock

First, an update on the size of the Biden infrastructure package, aka America Jobs Plan, from Politico on May 21 (also posted here): 

The Biden administration on Friday said it was slashing the price tag on an infrastructure proposal by more than $500 billion in an attempt to win Republican support...The White House’s counteroffer—to $1.7 trillion from $2.25 trillion—was meant to demonstrate that the administration remains eager to craft a deal with Republicans...

How to pay for any plan, be it $1.7 trillion or $568 billion, will be just as challenging, if not more. Lindsey McPherson of Roll Call explores Congress's partisan divide on infrastructure funding in a deep dive (source article) published May 18, prior to a Senate Finance Committee hearing held that day and a House Ways and Means Committee hearing on May 19 "to discuss the universe of potential infrastructure offsets."

Top Democrats argue voters would prefer tax increases on a small group of wealthy individuals and corporations to pay for infrastructure spending over broad-based “user fees” that would take a bigger chunk out of lower-income voters’ wallets.

More importantly, that's also the position of the Biden administration, laid out in the Treasury Department's Made in America Tax Plan released last month.

"Biden is pushing to raise the corporate tax rate to pay for the package, a non-starter for Senate Republicans, who have instead suggested user fees, which the White House says would violate Biden’s pledge not to raise taxes on people making less than $400,000," notes Politico.

Not all Democrats rule out user fees

However, it turns out that not all Democrats in Congress are opposed to user fees which have been the primary means of sustaining the Highway Trust Fund from 1956 until 2008. McPherson writes:

“I think there’s a willingness to consider how you fund it on an ongoing basis,” said Sen. Benjamin L. Cardin, D-Md., a member of the Environment and Public Works and Finance committees.

Senate Environment and Public Works Chairman Thomas R. Carper, D-Del., who also serves on Finance, told reporters ahead of a meeting with Biden last week that “those who use roads, highways, bridges … should bear part of the cost.”

Finance Committee chair, Sen. Ron Wyden, appears firmly in the camp of what Democrats are calling "progressive taxation."

“The only folks who are not on board with our agenda of progressive taxation are so many far-right Republicans in Congress and their donors,” the Oregon Democrat said at a virtual rally Monday hosted by Americans for Tax Fairness with John Anzalone, a Democratic strategist and Biden pollster, Speaker Nancy Pelosi and others.

By contrast, Finance Democrats such as Cardin, Carper and Washington’s Maria Cantwell are of the view that the past application of user fees to finance highways, airports and more makes it difficult to take those options off the table.

“We are not homogeneous,” Cantwell said of her fellow Finance Democrats.

Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., who has a long history of proposing legislation to hike fuel taxes and study mileage fee alternatives, "argues there’s a disconnect between public perception of those taxes outside the Beltway and the political pain they cause on Capitol Hill."

The gas tax has “increased in something like 36 states on a bipartisan basis. And the people who voted for it were reelected at a greater percentage than the people who voted against it,” said the Ways and Means member, who introduced gas tax increase bills in the last four Congresses. “But we’ve never had the context here where it made sense with an administration that would be supportive.”

The gas tax was last raised in 1993 by 4.3 cents per gallon by President Bill Clinton, the only Democratic president to have hiked the gas tax since the creation of the Highway Trust Fund in 1956 by President Dwight Eisenhower. Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush each raised the tax by a nickel a gallon in 1982 and 1990, respectively. [See "US Federal Government Gasoline Tax Since 1933" by ThoughtCo.]

Republican counter-proposal

"Republicans, led by West Virginia Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, proposed $568 billion in spending solely on physical infrastructure, paid for with user fees and unspent coronavirus relief funds," adds McPherson. [See Planetizen: GOP Counterproposal Aims to Restore the Infrastructure Status QuoApril 25.]

Capito and GOP senators who met with Biden at the White House last week are working on a revised offer with more detailed offsets."

However, the Capito plan doesn't hike gas taxes. Rather, it would "impose some user fees on electric vehicles, which pay no fuel tax," notes Capito's office. "A mileage fee is one idea floated."

Just such a fee caused Washington Gov. Jay Inslee to partially veto legislation on May 13 that would have set a goal of ending gas-powered passenger vehicle sales after 2030, a goal he promoted as a Democratic presidential primary candidate in 2019.

Hans Nichols and Alayna Treene of Axios on May 14 also explore Democratic divisions in terms of asking highway users, regardless of their incomes, to help fund the infrastructure package.

Some Senate Democrats are open to paying for a compromise infrastructure package by imposing user fees, including increasing the gas tax and raising money from electric car drivers through a vehicle-miles-traveled charge.

The last word goes to Blumenauer, the veteran user fee proponent.

"With the Biden administration opposed to a gas tax increase and a shift toward more fuel-efficient and electric cars that don’t pay as much into the system, Blumenauer is no longer pushing the idea," adds McPherson.

“We need to actually eliminate the gas tax and replace it with something that’s sustainable, but simply raising the gas tax is a distraction,” he said.

Related in Planetizen:

Tuesday, May 18, 2021 in Roll Call

portrait of professional woman

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban Planner

Get top-rated, practical training

Concrete Brutalism building with slanted walls and light visible through an atrium.

What ‘The Brutalist’ Teaches Us About Modern Cities

How architecture and urban landscapes reflect the trauma and dysfunction of the post-war experience.

February 28, 2025 - Justin Hollander

Complete Street

‘Complete Streets’ Webpage Deleted in Federal Purge

Basic resources and information on building bike lanes and sidewalks, formerly housed on the government’s Complete Streets website, are now gone.

February 27, 2025 - Streetsblog USA

Green electric Volkswagen van against a beach backdrop.

The VW Bus is Back — Now as an Electric Minivan

Volkswagen’s ID. Buzz reimagines its iconic Bus as a fully electric minivan, blending retro design with modern technology, a 231-mile range, and practical versatility to offer a stylish yet functional EV for the future.

March 3, 2025 - ABC 7 Eyewitness News

View of mountains with large shrubs in foreground in Altadena, California.

Healing Through Parks: Altadena’s Path to Recovery After the Eaton Fire

In the wake of the Eaton Fire, Altadena is uniting to restore Loma Alta Park, creating a renewed space for recreation, community gathering, and resilience.

7 hours ago - Pasadena NOw

Aerial view of single-family homes with swimming pools in San Diego, California.

San Diego to Rescind Multi-Unit ADU Rule

The city wants to close a loophole that allowed developers to build apartment buildings on single-family lots as ADUs.

March 9 - Axios

Close-up of row of electric cars plugged into chargers at outdoor station.

Electric Vehicles for All? Study Finds Disparities in Access and Incentives

A new UCLA study finds that while California has made progress in electric vehicle adoption, disadvantaged communities remain underserved in EV incentives, ownership, and charging access, requiring targeted policy changes to advance equity.

March 9 - UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation