Comparing the Environmental Impact of Building vs. Buying a Home

Which is better for the environment: buying an existing home, inefficiencies and all, or paying to build a new home with all the bells and whistles of green building technology?

4 minute read

October 13, 2017, 7:00 AM PDT

By Kayla Matthews @KaylaEMatthews


Ivy Covered Green Building

ale_rizzo / Shutterstock

As the world's human population grows, we're taking a bigger and bigger toll on the environment.

All those people need somewhere to live, and every home uses up land, energy, building materials, and other resources.

As people seek ways to reduce the environmental impact of their homes, they explore a number of different strategies. Green building trends are sweeping the nation, but many wonder if it's eco-friendlier to build a new home or buy and possibly renovate an older one.

The answer is it depends on the attributes of the home you would buy, build, or renovate.

In most cases, though, buying something that's already in existence is greener than building something new, because most, if not all, of the materials are already sourced.

The Waste Hierarchy

Buildings, which account for 38% of the world's carbon dioxide emissions and 40% of the raw materials we use, fit into the waste hierarchy we use for everything else. You may know this as "reduce, reuse, recycle," but it can also be split up into more specific categories. In order of most environmentally friendly to least, the waste hierarchy looks like this:

  • Prevention
  • Reduction
  • Reuse
  • Material Recovery (recycling, etc.)
  • Energy Recovery
  • Disposal

Buying a new home falls into the reuse category. Even if you complete significant remodeling, you will still be reducing the demand for new resources. When you use materials that are already in use, you eliminate the need for new.

It is possible, though, that building and living in a new home could be greener than an old home in the long-term if you take care to make the house environmentally friendly and energy efficient.

Building

Buying an existing home will usually be greener in the short-term, but that might not hold true in the long-term, depending on the characteristics of the building.

This may be especially true if you build and live in a new home that uses minimal energy and renewable energy as well as sustainable and recycled materials. Living in that home would likely be greener over the long-term than living in an already existing house that runs on fossil fuels, is not energy efficient, and needs repairs that require unsustainable materials.

If you're looking to build a new green home, the United States Green Building Council has a lot of valuable resources and also offers Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, or LEED, certification.

Buying

Buying an older home has an immediate advantage over building a new one in terms of eco-friendliness because you don't need to source new materials.

This prevents the destruction of natural areas and resources as well as the disposal of materials currently in use in buildings.

Buying a home also has economic advantages over building one.

It typically costs less, takes much less time and is more convenient. Rather than coordinate all the contractors, permits, and resources you need for the project, you can simply search online for homes for sale and visit open houses — you can even bid on real estate auctions online.

However, depending on the state of the home you purchase, it might have an environmental downside. Older homes might not be energy-efficient or be set up to conserve water and other resources.

Remodeling

To get the best of both worlds, more eco-conscious residents are opting to buy older homes and retrofit them to make them greener. This avoids the sourcing and use of entirely new materials, but it also allows you to incorporate some of the modern, green technologies that can reduce a home's environmental impact. In fact, 43% of respondents in a recent survey of U.S. housing industry professionals said they expect to work on a green building retrofit in the next three years.

If you're looking for a new place to live and want to keep it environmentally friendly, aim to use as few new resources as possible in the short-term, but also balance that with resource use in the long-term. For instance, some investments, such as improving energy efficiency or installing solar panels, may reduce energy use in the long-term, making the initial resource use worth it.

You should try to use existing resources as a base, though, which is why buying an older home and making any necessary upgrades is a green choice.

Purchasing an already-completed green home would be ideal, but if that's not an option, try buying an older home and retrofitting it to optimize energy use and sustainability. 


Kayla Matthews

Kayla Matthews is a journalist and writer covering future tech and infrastructure topics for publications like The Week and VentureBeat. In her free time, she also manages and edits her tech blog, ProductivityBytes.com.

portrait of professional woman

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban Planner

Get top-rated, practical training

Wastewater pouring out from a pipe.

Alabama: Trump Terminates Settlements for Black Communities Harmed By Raw Sewage

Trump deemed the landmark civil rights agreement “illegal DEI and environmental justice policy.”

April 13, 2025 - Inside Climate News

Logo for Planetizen Federal Action Tracker with black and white image of U.S. Capitol with water ripple overlay.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

April 16, 2025 - Diana Ionescu

Black and white photos of camp made up of small 'earthquake shacks' in Dolores Park in 1906 after the San Francisco earthquake.

The 120 Year Old Tiny Home Villages That Sheltered San Francisco’s Earthquake Refugees

More than a century ago, San Francisco mobilized to house thousands of residents displaced by the 1906 earthquake. Could their strategy offer a model for the present?

April 15, 2025 - Charles F. Bloszies

Ken Jennings stands in front of Snohomish County Community Transit bus.

Ken Jennings Launches Transit Web Series

The Jeopardy champ wants you to ride public transit.

April 20 - Streetsblog USA

Close-up on BLM sign on Continental Divide Trail in Rawlins, Wyoming.

BLM To Rescind Public Lands Rule

The change will downgrade conservation, once again putting federal land at risk for mining and other extractive uses.

April 20 - Public Domain

Calvary Street bridge over freeway in Indianapolis, Indiana.

Indy Neighborhood Group Builds Temporary Multi-Use Path

Community members, aided in part by funding from the city, repurposed a vehicle lane to create a protected bike and pedestrian path for the summer season.

April 20 - Smart Cities Dive