As the death toll from Mexico's 7.1 magnitude earthquake on Sept. 19 climbs above 300, the San Francisco Chronicle investigates how well prepared the Bay Area is for an earthquake of comparable magnitude. Not very well.
The day after Mexico City was hit with a 7.1 magnitude earthquake, Planetizen looked at the city of Los Angeles' "mandatory retrofit programs," which target pre-1978 wood-frame soft-story buildings and brittle concrete buildings.
With few exceptions, Bay Area cities are not as well prepared, somewhat similar to what Planetizen observed after a 6.0 earthquake shook Napa County on Aug. 24, 2014, resulting in over $1 billion in damage.
Ahead of the pack of the 101 cities and towns in the 9-county Bay Area is San Francisco which passed a law in 2013 requiring mandatory retrofits of wood-framed, multi-family buildings built before 1978 with a soft-story condition.
“That’s a visionary change and San Francisco was way out in front of other jurisdictions,” said geophysicist Ken Hudnut, science adviser for risk reduction for the U.S. Geological Survey, report John Wildermuth and J.K. Dineen “But in many cases, a lot of old stuff is grandfathered in and not all jurisdictions are as forward thinking as San Francisco.”
According to the Bay Area's council of governments, the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), only two other cities have mandatory wooden soft-story retrofit programs: Berkeley and Fremont. However, the amount of vulnerable buildings is incomparable, with San Francisco having 6,700 and Fremont only 22.
Wildermuth and Dineen write that "a 7.1 earthquake in the Bay Area could even be more deadly than the Mexico City temblor." In addition to soft-story wood buildings, "older concrete buildings -- which in San Francisco tend to be commercial buildings — are particularly vulnerable." [See the three types of buildings most vulnerable].
Unlike Los Angeles, the San Francisco retrofit program doesn't include non-ductile concrete buildings. ["'Ductile' means flexible, while 'reinforced concrete' refers to concrete embedded with material such as steel mesh and rebar," according to the Live Science website.
Finally, Wildermuth and Dineen also report extensively on what went wrong in Mexico City.
"Non-engineered construction is common in Mexico,” said Mario Ordaz and Roberto Meli, two engineering professors at UNAM, Mexico’s premier university, in their paper presented at a 2004 Vancouver, B.C., conference on earthquake engineering.
“As a consequence, a large percentage of the building stock (and in some parts of the country, the vast majority) is built without construction permits, without compliance with codes and without the participation of qualified professionals.”
Behzad Fatahi, an associate professor of geo-technical and earthquake engineering at the University of Technology Sydney, said it best in a CNN interview on Sept. 20:
Earthquakes do not kill; but inadequately designed and poorly constructed buildings, infrastructure and lifeline systems can.
The best way to save lives is to design structures that can withstand earthquakes and retrofit old buildings to fit the code.
FULL STORY: How ready will Bay Area be for next big quake?
Mexico City Earthquake Should Raise Questions About Building Safety
The epicenter of Tuesday's quake was in the state of Puebla, 80 miles southeast of Mexico City. Soft soil and unreinforced buildings magnified the damage. The quake comes two weeks after an 8.1 quake struck off the coast of the state of Oaxaca.
When it Comes to Seismic Safety, It's Each City for Itself
Buildings constructed of unreinforced masonry get much if not most of the media's attention on seismic safety, but so-called 'soft story' wood buildings, often with garages on the ground floor, compose the greatest numbers of vulnerable buildings.
San Francisco Considers More Aggressive Measures to Earthquake-Proof High Rises
The city has proposed tighter rules for new construction and a more active approach to securing existing tall structures from collapse.
What ‘The Brutalist’ Teaches Us About Modern Cities
How architecture and urban landscapes reflect the trauma and dysfunction of the post-war experience.
‘Complete Streets’ Webpage Deleted in Federal Purge
Basic resources and information on building bike lanes and sidewalks, formerly housed on the government’s Complete Streets website, are now gone.
The VW Bus is Back — Now as an Electric Minivan
Volkswagen’s ID. Buzz reimagines its iconic Bus as a fully electric minivan, blending retro design with modern technology, a 231-mile range, and practical versatility to offer a stylish yet functional EV for the future.
Healing Through Parks: Altadena’s Path to Recovery After the Eaton Fire
In the wake of the Eaton Fire, Altadena is uniting to restore Loma Alta Park, creating a renewed space for recreation, community gathering, and resilience.
San Diego to Rescind Multi-Unit ADU Rule
The city wants to close a loophole that allowed developers to build apartment buildings on single-family lots as ADUs.
Electric Vehicles for All? Study Finds Disparities in Access and Incentives
A new UCLA study finds that while California has made progress in electric vehicle adoption, disadvantaged communities remain underserved in EV incentives, ownership, and charging access, requiring targeted policy changes to advance equity.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
City of Albany
UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies
Mpact (formerly Rail~Volution)
Chaddick Institute at DePaul University
City of Piedmont, CA
Great Falls Development Authority, Inc.
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research