With a lack of suitable rental units and a lack of willing landlords, the city of Pittsburgh provides a case study for the failure of the Housing Choice Voucher Program to live up to its potential.
"It can take years to get a Section 8 voucher in Pittsburgh. But it takes just four months to lose it," according to an article by Kate Giammarise. The threat of losing a voucher refers to the 120-day time limit for finding a qualifying residence once a recipient has received a voucher. The time limit is especially problematic due to a shortage of units and a lack of landlords willing to accept subsidized rent.
Under the Housing Choice Voucher Program, or Section 8, as it's commonly known, "[a] family that receives a voucher must find a rental unit that meets a minimum standard and can pass a quality inspection. A subsidy is then paid by the housing authority administering the program directly to the landlord; the family pays the difference between the actual rent and the subsidy."
The key problem examines in the article is the willingness of landlords to accept vouchers, which often forces program recipients to lose their vouchers. Vouchers expire frequently enough that the Neighborhood Legal Services Association employs families who have lost vouchers.
More evidence of the vouchers' failure to live up to the promises of the program: the amount of money spent by the city compared to the amount of money the city receives for the program. "In 2013, the Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh received $41.9 million in voucher funding from the federal government but spent only $29.8 million of that on voucher payments," reports Giammarise. In 2014, "$13 million of the Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh’s $43.2 million voucher allocation didn’t go to vouchers." The article details how that remaining money was used, and also cites a number of experts who describe possible steps for improving the program in the city of Pittsburgh.
FULL STORY: For those with Section 8 vouchers, finding suitable housing difficult

What ‘The Brutalist’ Teaches Us About Modern Cities
How architecture and urban landscapes reflect the trauma and dysfunction of the post-war experience.

‘Complete Streets’ Webpage Deleted in Federal Purge
Basic resources and information on building bike lanes and sidewalks, formerly housed on the government’s Complete Streets website, are now gone.

The VW Bus is Back — Now as an Electric Minivan
Volkswagen’s ID. Buzz reimagines its iconic Bus as a fully electric minivan, blending retro design with modern technology, a 231-mile range, and practical versatility to offer a stylish yet functional EV for the future.

Healing Through Parks: Altadena’s Path to Recovery After the Eaton Fire
In the wake of the Eaton Fire, Altadena is uniting to restore Loma Alta Park, creating a renewed space for recreation, community gathering, and resilience.

San Diego to Rescind Multi-Unit ADU Rule
The city wants to close a loophole that allowed developers to build apartment buildings on single-family lots as ADUs.

Electric Vehicles for All? Study Finds Disparities in Access and Incentives
A new UCLA study finds that while California has made progress in electric vehicle adoption, disadvantaged communities remain underserved in EV incentives, ownership, and charging access, requiring targeted policy changes to advance equity.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
City of Albany
UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies
Mpact (formerly Rail~Volution)
Chaddick Institute at DePaul University
City of Piedmont, CA
Great Falls Development Authority, Inc.
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research