The $200,000 non-profit Buffalo CarShare program offer people living in poverty a low-cost option for short-term rentals of cars. Despite state support for the program, state insurance regulations might end it.
Because the cost of car share programs like Zipcar and Car2Go can be out of reach of some people who most need the benefits of automobile transportation, a non-profit in Buffalo, New York launched its own, more affordable car share service. Yet, as Jane Gottlieb reports, insurance problems are endangering the service.
Buffalo CarShare launched in 2008, thanks to the work of Michael Galligano. "At an average cost of $100 per month for membership and usage, it’s a relatively affordable way to rent a short-term ride," writes Gottlieb. "According to Galligano, half of the 900 Buffalo CarShare members earn less than $25,000 a year (though the company also has plenty of higher earners)."
Buffalo CarShare has attracted the financial support of the state's Department of Transportation and the Energy and Research Development Authority, which, according to Gottlieb, "awarded Buffalo CarShare $280,000 to replicate its model in other cities."
Yet it's the state's insurance regulations that threaten the ongoing existence of the program, unless a last minute intervention can save Buffalo CarShare when its current insurance policy expires on June 15. The article includes more detail about the state's insurance regulations and its potential impact on Buffalo CarShare and the people who depend on it.
FULL STORY: A Zipcar That Poor People Can Afford
Innovative Model Expands the Sharing Economy to Underserved Areas
Expanding car and bike share services beyond America's big cities and affluent demographics requires adaptability and old economy technologies. Buffalo CarShare is providing a model for success that even the big boys could learn from.
Electric Car Share Comes to Detroit’s Eastside
The program is operated by the Eastside Community Network and funded through the U.S. Department of Energy.
Why Car-Sharing Companies Keep Failing
The model comes with high costs that make it unsustainable without subsidies.
What ‘The Brutalist’ Teaches Us About Modern Cities
How architecture and urban landscapes reflect the trauma and dysfunction of the post-war experience.
‘Complete Streets’ Webpage Deleted in Federal Purge
Basic resources and information on building bike lanes and sidewalks, formerly housed on the government’s Complete Streets website, are now gone.
Downtown Los Angeles on the Rise: A Promising 2025
Fueled by new developments, cultural investments, and a growing dining scene, downtown Los Angeles is poised for significant growth in 2025, despite challenges from recent wildfires and economic uncertainties.
San Francisco Slow Streets Bucks Citywide Trend, Reducing Injuries by 61 Percent
Low-cost interventions aimed at slowing traffic are making a major impact on road safety.
How Single-Family Conversions Benefit Both Homeowners and Cities
Converting single-family homes to triplexes can ease the housing crisis and offer affordable, flexible options for more households. Why is it largely illegal?
Report: Transportation Equity Requires More Than Electrification
Lower-income households often lack the resources to buy electric cars, signaling a need for a more holistic approach to improving mobility and lowering transportation costs.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies
Mpact (formerly Rail~Volution)
Chaddick Institute at DePaul University
City of Piedmont, CA
Great Falls Development Authority, Inc.
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research