Oil prices are at a five-year low with gasoline prices averaging $2.67 a gallon, lowest since February 2010. Furthermore, they are expected to drop another 17 cents to $2.50 a gallon in time for Christmas, so why not raise the gas tax by a nickel?
The new 114th Congress must deal with the $100 billion question when it convenes in January: how to fund the nation's roads and transit. They face a May 31 deadline because funding for the Highway Trust Fund expires when the current patch bill that relies on "pension smoothing," clearly an unsustainable source of revenue, terminates.
"The obvious answer—the only answer, according to many in Washington—is to raise the 18.4 cent-per-gallon gas tax, which hasn't gone up in more than 20 years," writes Russell Berman of The Atlantic.
Yet even with prices at a four-year low, the odds of Congress touching the gas tax are as long as ever. "I think it’s too toxic and continues to be too toxic," said Steve LaTourette, the former Republican congressman best known for his close friendship with his fellow Ohioan, Speaker John Boehner. "I see no political will to get this done." [More from Boehner below.]
Berman gets a more optimistic scenario on the influence of falling gas prices from Rep. Tom Petri of Wisconsin, the new Republican co-sponsor of Rep. Earl Blumenauer's UPDATE Act that increases gas taxes a nickel a year for three year, and then indexes the tax to inflation.
"I don’t think there’s any question that it’s going to change the dynamics and make it much more palatable," he said. But he warned of a lag between the politics and the market. "It sometimes takes a little while for institutions to adjust to changes in the real world. So it may not happen instantly."
Significantly, as we noted earlier, Petri won't be in Congress to fight for his bill—he's retiring.
Unfortunately for Petri and other advocates of increasing the 18.4 cent gas tax, it appears they will not be able to expect any help from President Barack Obama. In fact, they may encounter opposition. Heather Caygle writes in Politico Morning Transportation about a meeting the president held on Dec. 3 with top business executives.
When asked by FedEx CEO Fred Smith why the White House doesn't get together with Congress and push for a gas tax hike in the lame duck, the president didn't sound too hopeful. "So the gas tax hasn't been increased for 20 years. There's a reason for that," he said. "In fairness to members of Congress, votes on gas taxes are really tough. Gas prices are one of those things that really bug people."
He said it may be time to stop looking to the gas tax as the savior of the Highway Trust Fund and instead find an alternate revenue source that "is not so politically frightening" to lawmakers. [Listen to the story here on NPR].
The president would fund his $302 billion infrastructure plan, known as the Grow America Act, not with a user fee but by "supplementing current revenues with $150 billion in one-time transition revenue from pro-growth business tax reform" as we noted last February. The revenue would be transferred from the general fund to the Highway Trust Fund, a subsidization pattern that has been a fixture for federal transportation funding since 2008 when the trust fund became insolvent.
[Note: some gas tax critics do not consider the gas tax a user fee.]
Speaker Boehner may be sympathetic to using business tax reform as the funding mechanism for a short term bill according to an earlier post. Berman uses a more specific term to denote just what kind of tax reform leaders have in mind: "repatriated corporate profits."
Berman sums up the prevalent attitude in Congress and the White House, "It's just one more frustrating example of a political culture paralyzed by fear of the voters' wrath, whether imagined or real."
Meanwhile, gas prices continue to plummet, and many infrastructure advocates must be asking themselves, if gas prices drop 17-cents this month alone to $2.50 a gallon, would anyone even notice a nickel increase in the gas tax?
FULL STORY: The Tax That Dare Not Be Hiked

What ‘The Brutalist’ Teaches Us About Modern Cities
How architecture and urban landscapes reflect the trauma and dysfunction of the post-war experience.

‘Complete Streets’ Webpage Deleted in Federal Purge
Basic resources and information on building bike lanes and sidewalks, formerly housed on the government’s Complete Streets website, are now gone.

The VW Bus is Back — Now as an Electric Minivan
Volkswagen’s ID. Buzz reimagines its iconic Bus as a fully electric minivan, blending retro design with modern technology, a 231-mile range, and practical versatility to offer a stylish yet functional EV for the future.

Healing Through Parks: Altadena’s Path to Recovery After the Eaton Fire
In the wake of the Eaton Fire, Altadena is uniting to restore Loma Alta Park, creating a renewed space for recreation, community gathering, and resilience.

San Diego to Rescind Multi-Unit ADU Rule
The city wants to close a loophole that allowed developers to build apartment buildings on single-family lots as ADUs.

Electric Vehicles for All? Study Finds Disparities in Access and Incentives
A new UCLA study finds that while California has made progress in electric vehicle adoption, disadvantaged communities remain underserved in EV incentives, ownership, and charging access, requiring targeted policy changes to advance equity.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
City of Albany
UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies
Mpact (formerly Rail~Volution)
Chaddick Institute at DePaul University
City of Piedmont, CA
Great Falls Development Authority, Inc.
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research