This week residents in the North Carolina Triangle (Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill) will provide input on key segments of a future regional light rail system. The project has been analyzed for 15 years, yet the question of whether to build it remains.

NC planners ask: Where to build light rail (and should we still do it?)
This week residents in the North Carolina Triangle (Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill) will provide input on key segments of a future regional light rail system. The project has been analyzed for 15 years and is now partially funded, yet the question of whether to build it still remains.
In a series of public workshops, Triangle Transit—lead agency for the proposed 51 mile system—will seek input on specific route configurations, and among the issues are where to locate station areas and maintenance facilities, which neighborhoods to serve, and how to avoid impacting streams and wetlands.
So why are they also asking whether to build the system at all? The system is estimated at $1.34 billion, which may be contribute to lingering doubt. Several Metropolitan Planning Organizations collaborated to help develop Triangle's future transit vision, which includes increased local bus service, expanded regional bus service, and light rail. The system would serve three counties, and almost two dozen cities, as well as several major employment centers, colleges, and the Raleigh-Durham International Airport. The 3000 square mile service area includes 1.5 million residents—approximately 13% of North Carolina's statewide population—and is expected to grow to 2.5 million by 2035.
The regional transit vision relies on new revenue sources, and some local funding is already in place via sales taxes and vehicle registration fees. However a comprehensive, long-term financing strategy with state and federal support has not been secured.
In their workshops this week, Triangle Transit continues to move the project forward, working to resolve key routing questions and asking a question still on everyone's mind: Should we build it?
FULL STORY: Public comments will help fix Orange-Durham light rail route

Study: Maui’s Plan to Convert Vacation Rentals to Long-Term Housing Could Cause Nearly $1 Billion Economic Loss
The plan would reduce visitor accommodation by 25,% resulting in 1,900 jobs lost.

Placekeeping: Setting a New Precedent for City Planners
How a preservation-based approach to redevelopment and urban design can prevent displacement and honor legacy communities.

Using Old Oil and Gas Wells for Green Energy Storage
Penn State researchers have found that repurposing abandoned oil and gas wells for geothermal-assisted compressed-air energy storage can boost efficiency, reduce environmental risks, and support clean energy and job transitions.

Washington State Plans Ambitious ‘Cycle Highway’ Network
The state is directing funding to close gaps in its existing bike network and make long-distance trips more accessible.

Homeowners Blame PG&E for Delays in ADU Permits
The utility says it has dramatically reduced its backlog, but applicants say they still face months-long delays for approvals for new electrical work.

Rethinking Wildfire Defense: How a Landscape Approach Can Protect Neighborhoods
Post-fire analysis of the Eaton Fire reveals that a landscape approach — including fire-resistant vegetation, home hardening, and strategic planning — can help reduce wildfire risk, challenging assumptions that trees and plants are primary fire hazards.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Borough of Carlisle
Caltrans
Heyer Gruel & Associates PA
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Salt Lake City
NYU Wagner Graduate School of Public Service
City of Cambridge, Maryland