This week residents in the North Carolina Triangle (Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill) will provide input on key segments of a future regional light rail system. The project has been analyzed for 15 years, yet the question of whether to build it remains.

NC planners ask: Where to build light rail (and should we still do it?)
This week residents in the North Carolina Triangle (Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill) will provide input on key segments of a future regional light rail system. The project has been analyzed for 15 years and is now partially funded, yet the question of whether to build it still remains.
In a series of public workshops, Triangle Transit—lead agency for the proposed 51 mile system—will seek input on specific route configurations, and among the issues are where to locate station areas and maintenance facilities, which neighborhoods to serve, and how to avoid impacting streams and wetlands.
So why are they also asking whether to build the system at all? The system is estimated at $1.34 billion, which may be contribute to lingering doubt. Several Metropolitan Planning Organizations collaborated to help develop Triangle's future transit vision, which includes increased local bus service, expanded regional bus service, and light rail. The system would serve three counties, and almost two dozen cities, as well as several major employment centers, colleges, and the Raleigh-Durham International Airport. The 3000 square mile service area includes 1.5 million residents—approximately 13% of North Carolina's statewide population—and is expected to grow to 2.5 million by 2035.
The regional transit vision relies on new revenue sources, and some local funding is already in place via sales taxes and vehicle registration fees. However a comprehensive, long-term financing strategy with state and federal support has not been secured.
In their workshops this week, Triangle Transit continues to move the project forward, working to resolve key routing questions and asking a question still on everyone's mind: Should we build it?
FULL STORY: Public comments will help fix Orange-Durham light rail route

What ‘The Brutalist’ Teaches Us About Modern Cities
How architecture and urban landscapes reflect the trauma and dysfunction of the post-war experience.

‘Complete Streets’ Webpage Deleted in Federal Purge
Basic resources and information on building bike lanes and sidewalks, formerly housed on the government’s Complete Streets website, are now gone.

The VW Bus is Back — Now as an Electric Minivan
Volkswagen’s ID. Buzz reimagines its iconic Bus as a fully electric minivan, blending retro design with modern technology, a 231-mile range, and practical versatility to offer a stylish yet functional EV for the future.

Healing Through Parks: Altadena’s Path to Recovery After the Eaton Fire
In the wake of the Eaton Fire, Altadena is uniting to restore Loma Alta Park, creating a renewed space for recreation, community gathering, and resilience.

San Diego to Rescind Multi-Unit ADU Rule
The city wants to close a loophole that allowed developers to build apartment buildings on single-family lots as ADUs.

Electric Vehicles for All? Study Finds Disparities in Access and Incentives
A new UCLA study finds that while California has made progress in electric vehicle adoption, disadvantaged communities remain underserved in EV incentives, ownership, and charging access, requiring targeted policy changes to advance equity.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
City of Albany
UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies
Mpact (formerly Rail~Volution)
Chaddick Institute at DePaul University
City of Piedmont, CA
Great Falls Development Authority, Inc.
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research