The Los Angeles Times reports on the Los Angeles Conservancy's 2014 Preservation Report Card, which "grades" each of L.A. County's local governments on their preservation programs (or lack thereof).
A new L.A. Conservancy report reveals that more than half of the county's local governments have no protections for their historic places.
The most effective protections for historic places often lie in the hands of local government. Los Angeles County has eighty-nine local governments: eighty-eight cities, plus the jurisdiction over the county's unincorporated areas. Each of these communities operates independently and has its own preservation protections—or lack thereof—for historic places.
The Los Angeles Conservancy’s 2014 Preservation Report Card “grades” the historic preservation programs of each jurisdiction based on specific elements, such as a preservation ordinance, surveys of historic places, and preservation incentives.
"It's a snapshot as to how well preservation is improving in L.A. County," said Adrian Scott Fine, director of advocacy for the Conservancy. "We want it to be used by communities as a tool so they can start assessing how they're doing."
While some communities have made great progress since the last Report Card was issued in 2008—particularly Beverly Hills, Burbank, and Calabasas—the overall outlook is less than rosy: More than half of the county’s communities have no protections whatsoever for their historic places. Progress in preservation programs has slowed in the past five years for reasons including staffing and program cutbacks during the recession of the late 2000s.
To help communities create or enhance their preservation programs, the 2014 Report Card includes innovations such as a new point-based scoring system, practical tips on how to improve, an interactive Digital Report Card chart, and web pages for each community with preservation contacts and resources.
FULL STORY: Most L.A. County cities failing to protect historic sites, study says

Americans May Be Stuck — But Why?
Americans are moving a lot less than they once did, and that is a problem. While Yoni Applebaum, in his highly-publicized article Stuck, gets the reasons badly wrong, it's still important to ask: why are we moving so much less than before?

Using Old Oil and Gas Wells for Green Energy Storage
Penn State researchers have found that repurposing abandoned oil and gas wells for geothermal-assisted compressed-air energy storage can boost efficiency, reduce environmental risks, and support clean energy and job transitions.

Placekeeping: Setting a New Precedent for City Planners
How a preservation-based approach to redevelopment and urban design can prevent displacement and honor legacy communities.

San Francisco’s Muni Ridership Grew in 2024
The system saw its highest ridership since before the Covid-19 pandemic, but faces a severe budget shortage in the coming year.

Colorado Lawmakers Move to Protect BRT Funding
In the face of potential federal funding cuts, CDOT leaders reasserted their commitment to planned bus rapid transit projects.

Safe Streets Funding in Jeopardy
The Trump administration is specifically targeting bike infrastructure and other road safety projects in its funding cuts.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Heyer Gruel & Associates PA
City of Moreno Valley
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Salt Lake City
NYU Wagner Graduate School of Public Service
City of Cambridge, Maryland