A foray by HUD into telling small towns how best to use their land

In April 2009, HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan spoke to the ULI Spring Council Forum in Atlanta; he stated that his administration’s goal was “to put the UD back in HUD,” and explained that HUD’s over-reliance on housing solutions wasn’t helping cities address their complex revitalization needs. Just over two years later, this small new funding program caught my eye on a list of new HUD announcements: *** HUD HOPE VI – $0.5 million Application Due: August 22, 2011 Eligible Entities: Local governments

3 minute read

October 1, 2011, 11:06 AM PDT

By Jess Zimbabwe @jzimbabwe


In April 2009, HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan spoke to the ULI
Spring Council Forum in Atlanta; he stated that his administration's goal was
"to put the UD back in HUD," and explained that HUD's over-reliance on housing
solutions wasn't helping cities address their complex revitalization needs. Just over two years later, this small new funding program
caught my eye on a list of new HUD announcements:

*** HUD HOPE VI – $0.5 million

Application Due: August 22, 2011

Eligible Entities: Local governments

HUD requests proposals for the HOPE VI Main Street Program.
This program provide grants to small communities to assist in the rejuvenation
of an historic or traditional central business district or "Main Street" area
by replacing unused commercial space in buildings with affordable housing
units. HUD encourages activities that actively promote sustainability through
enhancing energy efficient measures.

Now, I suppose it
would be fair to assume that a community who applies for this program has
already studied the parcels and "Main Street" area in question and made a
determination that housing would be a long-term better usage of the land than
the existing commercial use, but it strikes me as exceeding the bounds of the
federal government to make the presumption on behalf of eligible small
communities that this land use change should be made. Indeed, the program is
only open to communities with 50,000 or fewer residents, which describes
communities that don't often have a surfeit of professional planning capacity
to study a question like this before chasing federal funds. HUD could have made
one of the eligibility criteria that the locality has a comprehensive plan or
zoning in place that would support this dramatic land use change. By not doing
so, this program seems to encourage the local funding recipient to enact a spot
rezoning for the affected properties.

The stated objectives of the program are to: "Redevelop Main
Street areas; Preserve historic or traditional architecture or design features
in Main Street areas; Enhance economic development efforts in Main Street
areas; and Provide affordable housing in Main Street areas." Of these goals,
only the fourth (providing affordable housing) is clearly met by every
allowable expenditure under the program. Replacing viable downtown commercial
space with housing units seems like a questionable move towards "enhancing
economic development"  and from the
perspective of preserving historic and traditional architecture, rehabilitating
older downtown buildings for re-use as housing is generally only preferable if
the only alternative is to tear the obsolete structure down.

Especially in the current economic climate, which has
created extreme volatility in many communities' retail, restaurant, office, and
light manufacturing industries, I can see many communities being interested in
the idea of using federal funds to address vacant storefronts through this
program, but I'm not sure it's wise for them to do so. Hundreds of small
downtowns are struggling now, but removing commercial space, breaking up what
little retail continuity exists, and adding first floor residences that are
bound to close themselves from the street seem like moves that will facilitate rather
than stop the pattern of decline. Why not use this funding to promote
developing additional affordable housing units on vacant land or land that is adjacent
to existing downtowns? Predicating the funding on
a local land use change from commercial to residential incentivizes short-term
decision making, and leaves a lot of "UD" still left to do for struggling small
downtowns.

I'm curious:

  • Do you
    know any communities who applied?
  • Can you
    think of smaller downtowns that would benefit from this program?
  • Do you
    think it's advisable to make such a dramatic land use shift?
  • Do you
    have examples of affordable housing in small downtowns that are located in formerly commercial
    space and contribute to the downtown's economic development?

I'll watch for the results of this funding and report back
about the community(ies) that are awarded.


Jess Zimbabwe

Jess Zimbabwe is the Principal of Plot Strategies. She served until recently for ten years as the founding Director of the Daniel Rose Center for Public Leadership—a partnership the National League of Cities (NLC) and the Urban Land Institute (ULI). The Center’s flagship program was the Daniel Rose Fellowship, which brought the mayors and senior leadership teams of 4 cities together for a year-long program of learning from land use experts, technical assistance, study tours, leadership development, and peer-to-peer exchange.

portrait of professional woman

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban Planner

Get top-rated, practical training

Wastewater pouring out from a pipe.

Alabama: Trump Terminates Settlements for Black Communities Harmed By Raw Sewage

Trump deemed the landmark civil rights agreement “illegal DEI and environmental justice policy.”

April 13, 2025 - Inside Climate News

Logo for Planetizen Federal Action Tracker with black and white image of U.S. Capitol with water ripple overlay.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

April 16, 2025 - Diana Ionescu

Black and white photos of camp made up of small 'earthquake shacks' in Dolores Park in 1906 after the San Francisco earthquake.

The 120 Year Old Tiny Home Villages That Sheltered San Francisco’s Earthquake Refugees

More than a century ago, San Francisco mobilized to house thousands of residents displaced by the 1906 earthquake. Could their strategy offer a model for the present?

April 15, 2025 - Charles F. Bloszies

White on-demand microtransit transit vehicle in Missouri.

Rural Missouri Transit Service Could Lose State Funding

OATS Transit offers low-cost rides to primarily elderly rural residents with little or no access to other transportation options.

7 seconds ago - The Daily Yonder

Entrance to subterranean Hollywood/Vine Metro station in Los Angeles, California surrounded by tall apartment buildings.

Opinion: California’s SB 79 Would Improve Housing Affordability and Transit Access

A proposed bill would legalize transit-oriented development statewide.

April 21 - San Gabriel Valley Tribune

Yellow roadside sign with extreme heat warning: "Danger - Extreme Conditions! - STOP - Do not hike Jun-Sep - HEAT KILLS"

Record Temperatures Prompt Push for Environmental Justice Bills

Nevada legislators are proposing laws that would mandate heat mitigation measures to protect residents from the impacts of extreme heat.

April 21 - Nevada Current