Do Economists Agree On Road Pricing?

A new academic journal article offers an interesting and highly detailed history of the concept of road pricing, and evaluates where economists have (and have not) reached consensus on the issue.

3 minute read

May 19, 2006, 1:00 PM PDT

By Chris Steins @planetizen


Author Robin Lindsey writes in her abstract: "My search of the economic literature did not find a soul who favours traffic jams. Moreover, I find strong consensus among economists on how to reduce traffic jams. Especially in light of modern electronic toll collection, they believe in pricing highway capacity as a scarce resource. Beyond that primary insight, however, there is much disagreement.

Economists disagree over how to set tolls, how to cover common costs, what to do with any excess revenues, whether and how 'losers' from tolling previously free roads should be compensated, and whether to privatize highways. These disagreements fill a lot of pages, while the main point of agreement is largely taken for granted. Practically all economists who write on the matter agree that where there is significant congestion on highways, the price should not be zero."

From the paper:

"The flurry of interest in road pricing over the last decade or so might suggest that road pricing is an idea whose time has come (or, rather, come back!). Intercity toll roads are prevalent today in Western Europe, Mexico, Japan, China and other countries. And a number of projects are now either under development, or have been proposed, including area-wide tolling for Britain and the state of Oregon using Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) technology. Yet, despite the historical tradition of tolls and the longstanding theoretical argument for road pricing, only a few cities have implemented road pricing in any form, and the number of schemes designed to control traffic congestion is even fewer.

From the conclusion:

..."This article has surveyed the literature to determine whether economists support road pricing both in theory and in practice. There is a strong consensus among economists that road pricing ought to be used to reduce and manage congestion. This position has strengthened as technology has reduced the costs of collecting and paying toll charges. Beyond that primary insight, however, there is much disagreement."

..."Most economists now accept short-run marginal cost as the appropriate basis for pricing transportation generally, and roads specifically. However, most economists also entertain departures from SRMC pricing in its strictest sense, and there has been much interest recently in developing practical models of second-best pricing. There also remains a residual tension between the goal of allocative efficiency, which is best served by SRMC pricing, and the goal of cost recovery which calls for average-cost pricing at some (often ill-defined) level of aggregation over modes and user groups."

..."This is an exciting time for road pricing. Opponents may hope that present efforts will fail and another chapter in the long history of unsuccessful road pricing attempts will be written. Devotees of Pigou and Vickrey will hope that public toll roads or other forms of road pricing will flourish to tame the congestion beast. And admirers of Friedman and Boorstin will look forward to a resurrection of private toll roads that ruled in the turnpike era."

[Editor's note: The link below is to the May, 2006 issue of Econ Journal Watch (EJW) in its PDF format. This article appears on pages 292-379 of the issue.]

Thanks to Peter Gordon's Blog

Thursday, May 18, 2006 in Econ Journal Watch

portrait of professional woman

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban Planner

Get top-rated, practical training

Bird's eye view of manufactured home park.

Manufactured Crisis: Losing the Nation’s Largest Source of Unsubsidized Affordable Housing

Manufactured housing communities have long been an affordable housing option for millions of people living in the U.S., but that affordability is disappearing rapidly. How did we get here?

March 25, 2025 - Shelterforce

U-Haul truck on road with blurred grassy roadside in background.

Americans May Be Stuck — But Why?

Americans are moving a lot less than they once did, and that is a problem. While Yoni Applebaum, in his highly-publicized article Stuck, gets the reasons badly wrong, it's still important to ask: why are we moving so much less than before?

March 27, 2025 - Alan Mallach

Rusty abandoned oil well and equipment with prickly pear cactus next to it in West Texas.

Using Old Oil and Gas Wells for Green Energy Storage

Penn State researchers have found that repurposing abandoned oil and gas wells for geothermal-assisted compressed-air energy storage can boost efficiency, reduce environmental risks, and support clean energy and job transitions.

March 31, 2025 - Pennsylvania State University

Colorful blocky apartment building facade.

Minneapolis Bans Rent-Setting Software

Four cities have enacted restrictions on algorithmic software that can inflate rent costs.

April 1 - Stateline

Silver electric BMW car parked in driveway of home in Oakland, California.

Oakland to Add 244 New EV Chargers

Oakland plans to launch its new charging network at eight locations by the end of 2025.

April 1 - City of Oakland

Sculpture of seated Jane Goodall holding hands with chimp on green lawn.

Jane Goodall Inspires with Message of Hope, Resilience, and Environmental Action

Speaking in Pasadena, Jane Goodall offered a hopeful and inspirational message, urging global compassion, environmental responsibility, and the power of individual action to shape a better future.

April 1 - Pasadena Star-News