A new study highlights the complex challenge of addressing tree canopy disparities in South L.A., where historical environmental injustices, budget constraints, and competing community priorities hinder efforts to increase equitable tree coverage.

A recent study led by the University of Southern California (USC) and the South L.A. Tree Coalition highlights the complex challenge of increasing tree canopy in South Los Angeles, a region that has long faced environmental injustices. The study, “Rooted Connections,” reveals that while community leaders value trees for their cooling effects and public health benefits, they also face competing priorities like homelessness and gentrification, making the lack of trees more than just an environmental issue. With city budget cuts affecting urban forestry efforts, progress toward equitable tree distribution in underserved areas could be delayed.
As reported by Lila Seidman, the study also emphasizes the historical context behind the lack of trees in South L.A., citing discriminatory planning practices that have led to a disproportionate lack of greenery. Areas like South L.A. have tree canopies as low as 5 percent, compared to wealthier neighborhoods with significantly more coverage. Community leaders interviewed in the study pointed out the mental and physical health impacts of heat and the absence of natural spaces, as well as concerns about tree planting being associated with gentrification, signaling the need for intentional and community-led greening efforts.
Despite limited resources, efforts to improve canopy coverage are underway, with the Urban Forestry Division focusing on an equity-based approach to prioritize tree planting in high-need areas. However, achieving this goal requires more than just planting trees—it will necessitate a commitment to maintenance, partnerships with nonprofit groups, and adequate funding to ensure long-term success in addressing both environmental and social justice issues in South Los Angeles.
FULL STORY: ‘There is no easy fix’: Study reveals attitudes about lack of trees in South L.A.

What ‘The Brutalist’ Teaches Us About Modern Cities
How architecture and urban landscapes reflect the trauma and dysfunction of the post-war experience.

‘Complete Streets’ Webpage Deleted in Federal Purge
Basic resources and information on building bike lanes and sidewalks, formerly housed on the government’s Complete Streets website, are now gone.

Downtown Los Angeles on the Rise: A Promising 2025
Fueled by new developments, cultural investments, and a growing dining scene, downtown Los Angeles is poised for significant growth in 2025, despite challenges from recent wildfires and economic uncertainties.

A Plan to Expand Tree Canopy Across Dayton
Dayton is developing an urban forest master plan, using a $2 million grant to expand its tree canopy, address decades of tree loss, and enhance environmental equity across the city.

Decarbonizing Homes: The Case for Electrifying Residential Heating
A new MIT study finds that transitioning residential heating from natural gas to electric heat pumps can significantly reduce carbon emissions and operational costs.

Preserving Altadena’s Trees: A Community Effort to Save a Fire-Damaged Landscape
In the wake of the Eaton Fire, Altadena Green is working to preserve fire-damaged but recoverable trees, advocating for better assessment processes, educating homeowners, and protecting the community’s urban canopy from unnecessary removal.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies
Mpact (formerly Rail~Volution)
Chaddick Institute at DePaul University
City of Piedmont, CA
Great Falls Development Authority, Inc.
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research