Plaintiffs claim the new state law strips local control of growth, but affordable housing advocates say the lawsuit is just a delay tactic.

Eight New Jersey mayors filed a lawsuit earlier this month against a recently enacted state housing law, S50/A4, which standardized requirements for municipalities to build more housing. According to an article by Brianna Kudisch for NJ.com, the lawsuit claims the state law exceeds what is constitutionally required under state Supreme Court decisions that “outlawed exclusionary zoning practices and required all towns in New Jersey to provide their fair share of the region’s affordable housing” and questions the law’s exemption of 62 municipalities from having affordable housing obligations.
The article reports that an additional eight municipalities are expected to join the lawsuit later the month, but says affordable housing advocates are confident the suit has no legal standing and predict it will be thrown out of court. Adam Gordon, the executive director of the nonprofit Fair Share Housing Center, told NJ.com the lawsuit is a “smokescreen” meant to delay implementation of the law, put forth by “ultra-wealthy communities who have fought affordable housing for decades.”
The plaintiffs claim the law takes away their towns’ say in how they grow, but Gordon told NJ.com that the state law in question “gives towns tools — including new bonuses, financing options and credits — to build affordable housing in the way they want….Towns only lose their ability to be in control of the process when they refuse to find any place to create their fair share of affordable housing.”
According to the National Low Income Housing Coalition, New Jersey has a shortage of 214,000 units of affordable rental housing, and of the 25 percent of the state’s renter households that are extremely low income (making less than $33,290 annually), 74 percent are severely cost burdened.
FULL STORY: 9 N.J. towns sue the state over new affordable housing law

Americans May Be Stuck — But Why?
Americans are moving a lot less than they once did, and that is a problem. While Yoni Applebaum, in his highly-publicized article Stuck, gets the reasons badly wrong, it's still important to ask: why are we moving so much less than before?

Using Old Oil and Gas Wells for Green Energy Storage
Penn State researchers have found that repurposing abandoned oil and gas wells for geothermal-assisted compressed-air energy storage can boost efficiency, reduce environmental risks, and support clean energy and job transitions.

Placekeeping: Setting a New Precedent for City Planners
How a preservation-based approach to redevelopment and urban design can prevent displacement and honor legacy communities.

San Diego Swaps Parking Lane for Kid-Friendly Mini Park
The block-long greenway will feature interactive play equipment and landscaping.

Tracking the Invisible: Methane Leaks From LA’s Neighborhood Oil Sites
Environmental advocates are using infrared technology to monitor and document methane leaks from neighborhood oil sites, filling regulatory gaps and pushing for stronger protections to safeguard community health and the climate.

Montana Bill Promotes Parking Reform
A bill before the Montana state senate would bar cities from requiring more than one parking spot per new housing unit.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Heyer Gruel & Associates PA
City of Moreno Valley
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Salt Lake City
NYU Wagner Graduate School of Public Service
City of Cambridge, Maryland