Study: Retrofitting Old Buildings Has Lower Total Carbon Footprint Than New Construction

A study of over a million Chicago buildings assessed their ‘embodied carbon’ footprint over their lifetimes, showing that demolishing an old building in favor of a new one almost always produced more emissions.

2 minute read

September 12, 2024, 9:00 AM PDT

By Diana Ionescu @aworkoffiction


A study of embodied carbon — carbon emissions produced over the entire life cycle of a product — produced by buildings found that retrofitting existing buildings produces significantly lower emissions over the entire life cycle, reports Nish Amarnath in Smart Cities Dive.

As a result, demolishing an existing building to construct a new one makes little sense from an environmental perspective, even if that new building is more energy efficient, according to the research note.

According to Amarnath, understanding the total carbon impacts of a building is difficult in the United States due to a lack of a comprehensive building inventory and building-level data as well as no clear benchmarks for assessing embodied carbon.

The researchers used data from over 1 million Chicago buildings to show that “increasing the average lifespan of buildings from 50 years to 75 or 80 years and reducing building size by 20% can cut their overall carbon emissions by two-thirds.” Buildings with masonry structures and walls have the highest emissions over their life cycle, while buildings with wooden structural elements and shingled roofs have the lowest emissions.

The researchers acknowledge the challenges of retrofitting older buildings, noting that some energy efficiency upgrades can also increase the overall production of embodied carbon. “If the goal is to enhance energy efficiency and achieve long-term cost savings, upgrading the HVAC system and improving the building envelope should be prioritized.”

Wednesday, September 11, 2024 in Smart Cities Dive

"Planetizen federal action tracker" logo superimposed over black and white image of US Capitol dome.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

November 11, 2026 - Zachary Whalen

A road in north eastern Nebraska with power lines on either side, and grassy fields.

Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity

Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.

November 6, 2026 - Grist

People walking and cycling on a street in Boston.

Study reveals best places in the U.S. for cycling, walking

New research from Streetlight Data examines bicycle and pedestrian miles per capita in the 100 largest U.S. cities by population.

November 8, 2026 - Smart Cities Dive

Mamdani speaks behind a podium in a navy suit.

DSA members accuse Mamdani of 'abandoning values' over housing redevelopment

New York City's mayor plans to replace about 2,000 units of public housing with private, mixed-income housing.

November 12 - Gothamist

Streetview of Colorado boulevard, a multi-lane road with trees on either side.

All sides of BRT debate unhappy with CDOT’s most recent move

The Colorado Department of Transportation is no longer considering center-running bus lanes for Colorado Boulevard.

November 12 - 9 News

Solar panels above a cranberry boy, with workers collecting berries.

Massachusetts bogs generate both power, and cranberries

Putting solar panels above farmland is one way Massachusetts is advancing toward its goal of net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.

November 12 - Grist

FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?

After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.

Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold

The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.