A new report warns that microtransit is nothing more than a taxpayer funded Uber with potentially dangerous consequences for existing traditional transit services.

Microtransit pilots and programs are popping up across the country. But, Streetsblog’s Kea Wilson reports, some transportation experts are sounding the alarm that the promise of complementing or replacing traditional fixed-route vehicles with sedans, vans, or shuttles that offer door-to-door service is just “app-taxis by another name.” It’s too good to be true, according to a new report from the Amalgamated Transit Union, which shows that microtransit is already costing local transportation agencies two to three times more per passenger than their worst-performing bus routes on average.
The report outlines additional cracks in microtransit’s veneer:
- Few passengers are actually going anywhere near each other at the same time, meaning the majority of rides are single-person.
- As popularity rises, as it’s bound to for “dirt-cheap, mostly private chauffeur service,” agencies are forced to raise fares or deny requests for rides above their capacity.
- Data from several cities show microtransit is more likely to serve able, white-bodied affluent residents than BIPOC, disabled, and low-income passengers.
- Microtransit operations are often contracted out to private companies, who often don’t provide their part-time gig-worker drivers with basic benefits or guaranteed working hours and in some cases are requested to lease their vehicles from the company and pay for fuel out of their own pockets.
“Despite this, some agencies still choose to do whatever it takes to keep microtransit going — including cannibalizing funds from fixed route transit, accelerating a death spiral that's already been spinning faster since the pandemic,” Wilson writes.
Does that mean cities should avoid microtransit at all costs? The report author says not necessarily, but that it’s best for transit agencies to focus investments on their core service and reserve in-house micro-transit service in the limited situations that are worth a steep subsidy to decrease fares — such as “providing accessible paratransit vans to people with disabilities, piloting service in new neighborhoods that might someday get a dedicated route, and providing those elusive last-mile connections” — while paying drivers a living wage and benefits.
FULL STORY: Microtranist Is Taxpayer Funded Uber, Advocates Warn — And It’s a Threat to Real Transit

Alabama: Trump Terminates Settlements for Black Communities Harmed By Raw Sewage
Trump deemed the landmark civil rights agreement “illegal DEI and environmental justice policy.”

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

The 120 Year Old Tiny Home Villages That Sheltered San Francisco’s Earthquake Refugees
More than a century ago, San Francisco mobilized to house thousands of residents displaced by the 1906 earthquake. Could their strategy offer a model for the present?

In Both Crashes and Crime, Public Transportation is Far Safer than Driving
Contrary to popular assumptions, public transportation has far lower crash and crime rates than automobile travel. For safer communities, improve and encourage transit travel.

Report: Zoning Reforms Should Complement Nashville’s Ambitious Transit Plan
Without reform, restrictive zoning codes will limit the impact of the city’s planned transit expansion and could exclude some of the residents who depend on transit the most.

Judge Orders Release of Frozen IRA, IIJA Funding
The decision is a victory for environmental groups who charged that freezing funds for critical infrastructure and disaster response programs caused “real and irreparable harm” to communities.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Clanton & Associates, Inc.
Jessamine County Fiscal Court
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions
Salt Lake City
NYU Wagner Graduate School of Public Service