Environmental Groups Win Court Battle Against the Minneapolis 2040 Comprehensive Plan

A court ruling invalidated one of the most innovative comprehensive plans in recent memory, and now the city of Minneapolis must revert to its previous comprehensive plan.

3 minute read

September 6, 2023, 9:00 AM PDT

By James Brasuell @CasualBrasuell


The landmark Minneapolis 2040 Comprehensive Plan, famous for eliminating single-family zoning citywide, is no longer the plan of record in Minneapolis, reports Susan Du for the Star Tribune. The city now has 60 days to revert back to its 2030 Plan, according to a recent court ruling.

The same environmental organizations that have been opposing the plan since 2018 have managed to invalidate the landmark plan. Hennepin County District Judge Joseph R. Klein made the most recent ruling—the most recent in a string of rulings that has slowed and obstructed the approval and implementation of the plan over the same period.

Of relevance far beyond the borders of the state of Minnesota, is the decision by Judge Klein that the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act (MERA) applies to local comprehensive plans. The city had been arguing that “municipal comprehensive plans — big-vision documents — should not be subject to the type of environmental review that could be conducted on individual projects with clear specifications to assess,” reports Du.

Judge Klein’s ruling also decides, moreover, that Minneapolis 2040 would create environmental harm. “This court finds that any ongoing implementation of the residential development portions of the City's 2040 Plan is an ongoing violation of [the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act,” wrote Judge Klein in the decision. “Plaintiffs have outlined numerous environmental impairments that are likely to result by virtue of the full implementation of the 2040 Plan. The court finds that such damage to the environment would be an irreparable harm to the environment, the protection of which is viewed by this state as being of paramount concern.”

Environmental organizations, including Smart Growth Minneapolis and Minnesota Citizens for the Protection of Migratory Birds, have been arguing for years now that the “cumulative impact of the comprehensive plan would pollute public waters while reducing green space for wildlife,” according to Du.

Add Minneapolis 2040 to the large pile of an innovative plan to allow more residential density undone by the consequences of environmental legislation—a familiar narrative in California and Washington—but one of questionable scientific logic. Research has repeatedly shown that higher density residential neighborhoods encourage walking and other forms of non-automobile mobility, which can lower greenhouse gas emissions as well as air and other forms of pollution, while suburban development patterns are harmful enough to erase any potential benefit from more efficient urban spaces.

Yet environmental laws are frequently wielded to prevent any form of development other than automobile dependent single-family detached housing, and sometimes also for the sole purpose of extracting legal settlements from developers. None of the environmental benefits of density are mentioned in the article by Du, nor are the pernicious applications of the environmental laws around the country. It’s unclear from the article if the city argued against the complaint that Minneapolis 2040 would be worse for the environment than the previous comprehensive plan.

According to the article, the plan “garnered controversy from residents concerned that the plan would enrich rental property developers without growing opportunities for homeownership, where Minnesota has lingering racial disparities.” Du quotes a representative of the plaintiff’s legal team in describing the ruling as a victory for racial justice. “The city now has an opportunity to create a more inclusive plan that factors in the unique needs of communities of color and environmental impacts to Minneapolis residents,” says Levy Armstrong.

For more on the key moments of the history of Minneapolis 2040, see previous articles from Planetizen, below.

Tuesday, September 5, 2023 in Star Tribune

portrait of professional woman

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban Planner

Get top-rated, practical training

Historic homes in St. Augustine, Florida.

Florida Considers Legalizing ADUs

Current state law allows — but doesn’t require — cities to permit accessory dwelling units in single-family residential neighborhoods.

March 18, 2025 - Newsweek

Bird's eye view of manufactured home park.

Manufactured Crisis: Losing the Nation’s Largest Source of Unsubsidized Affordable Housing

Manufactured housing communities have long been an affordable housing option for millions of people living in the U.S., but that affordability is disappearing rapidly. How did we get here?

March 25, 2025 - Shelterforce

U-Haul truck on road with blurred grassy roadside in background.

Americans May Be Stuck — But Why?

Americans are moving a lot less than they once did, and that is a problem. While Yoni Applebaum, in his highly-publicized article Stuck, gets the reasons badly wrong, it's still important to ask: why are we moving so much less than before?

March 27, 2025 - Alan Mallach

Cars parked and plugged in at an EV charging lot in Santa Monica, California surrounded by palm trees.

EV Chargers Now Outnumber Gas Pumps by Nearly 50% in California

Fast chargers still lag behind amidst rapid growth.

March 28 - Inside EVs

Construction workers on a suspended platform are installing thermal insulation on the facade of a modern apartment building, improving energy efficiency and reducing heat loss during cold weather.

Affordable Housing Renovations Halt Mid-Air Amidst DOGE Clawbacks

HUD may rescind over a billion dollars earmarked for green building upgrades.

March 28 - Bloomberg CityLab

Sign above entrance of United States Department of Transportation.

Has Anyone at USDOT Read Donald Shoup?

USDOT employees, who are required to go back to the office, will receive free parking at the agency’s D.C. offices — flying in the face of a growing research body that calls for pricing parking at its real value.

March 28 - Streetsblog USA