TxDOT has filed “takings lawsuits” against holdout property owners along the eight-mile stretch of I-35 slated for widening in Austin, but property owners say the agency isn't offering just compensation.

The I-35 expansion in Austin has drawn loud and extensive opposition from locals, including multiple lawsuits against the Texas Department of Transportation aimed at stopping the project. But TxDOT is in the early stages of waging a legal battle of its own, according to an article in local news outlet KXAN. Kelsey Thompson reports that an Austin-based attorney representing more than a dozen property owners has confirmed TxDOT is suing several of his clients over property acquisitions.
“More than 100 residences and businesses along the eight-mile project corridor — running along I-35 from U.S. Highway 290 East to State Highway 71 and Ben White Boulevard — were marked for displacement due to the planned expansions,” Thompson writes. Property owners began receiving initial offers from TxDOT last year as part of the eminent domain process (when the government exercises its constitutional right to take private property for public use, with just compensation). That catch, according to property owners? The properties are worth more than TxDOT is offering, which violates their Fifth Amendment rights and constitute an illegal taking.
“TxDOT has previously told KXAN it works with an independent appraiser to assess the market value of properties it’s looking to buy as part of a planned project,” Thompson writes. But property owners' attorney says those assessments don’t include dramatic increases in Austin property values in recent years, including changes to Austin’s development code like removal of minimum parking requirements, new zoning overlays, and opportunity for denser development. Property owners also contend that they can’t find comparable areas or properties to relocate with the amount of money TxDOT is offering. Their attorney told KXAN he "expects many of the jury trials related to the I-35 Capital Express Central project will come sometime in 2025 or later on."
FULL STORY: TxDOT sues several displaced properties amid planned I-35 expansion

What ‘The Brutalist’ Teaches Us About Modern Cities
How architecture and urban landscapes reflect the trauma and dysfunction of the post-war experience.

‘Complete Streets’ Webpage Deleted in Federal Purge
Basic resources and information on building bike lanes and sidewalks, formerly housed on the government’s Complete Streets website, are now gone.

The VW Bus is Back — Now as an Electric Minivan
Volkswagen’s ID. Buzz reimagines its iconic Bus as a fully electric minivan, blending retro design with modern technology, a 231-mile range, and practical versatility to offer a stylish yet functional EV for the future.

Healing Through Parks: Altadena’s Path to Recovery After the Eaton Fire
In the wake of the Eaton Fire, Altadena is uniting to restore Loma Alta Park, creating a renewed space for recreation, community gathering, and resilience.

San Diego to Rescind Multi-Unit ADU Rule
The city wants to close a loophole that allowed developers to build apartment buildings on single-family lots as ADUs.

Electric Vehicles for All? Study Finds Disparities in Access and Incentives
A new UCLA study finds that while California has made progress in electric vehicle adoption, disadvantaged communities remain underserved in EV incentives, ownership, and charging access, requiring targeted policy changes to advance equity.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
City of Albany
UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies
Mpact (formerly Rail~Volution)
Chaddick Institute at DePaul University
City of Piedmont, CA
Great Falls Development Authority, Inc.
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research