Three Bay Area Counties May Decide Whether to Support Caltrain with Sales Tax Measure

The oldest commuter rail line west of the Mississippi is also unique in another way—it lacks a dedicated source of operating revenue. Legislation has been introduced to allow Peninsula counties to vote to increase sales taxes by 0.125 percent.

3 minute read

June 26, 2017, 9:00 AM PDT

By Irvin Dawid


Caltrain

Eric Broder Van Dyke / Shutterstock

While Caltrain has one of the highest farebox recovery ratios in North America at 63 percent, that still leaves about 37 percent that is filled by "voluntary contributions from the three counties participating in the joint powers authority, and is the only passenger rail service in the U.S. to be financed in that manner," reports Sara Gaiser of Bay City News.

Senate Bill 797, introduced by state Sen. Jerry Hill, D-San Mateo, along with several other Bay Area senators and Assembly members, would authorize the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board, which runs Caltrain, to place a one-eighth-cent sales tax on the ballot in San Francisco, San Mateo and Santa Clara counties.

SB 797 is intended to end fluctuations in those contributions and establish a reliable funding source, according to Hill.

The bill, introduced late in the legislative season on June 21 through the gut-and-amend process, i.e., stripping an unrelated bill that had cleared the Senate on May 31 and inserting the new text, so the bill went directly to the Assembly Rules Committee. While the bill need only pass with a majority vote and be signed by Gov. Jerry Brown, there are additional challenges.

The measure could only be placed on the ballot once the joint powers board gives it two-thirds approval. The boards of supervisors for San Francisco, San Mateo and Santa Clara counties and transportation authorities in the three counties would also have to approve it [by majority vote].

The final step is approval by the voters, also by a two-thirds supermajority. The legislation does not set a date for the election.

"The bill is backed by business groups including the Silicon Valley Leadership Group (SVLG) and SAMCEDA, the San Mateo County Economic Development Association," reports Adina Levin for Friends of Caltrain. According to Katy Murphy of The Mercury News, SVLG is sponsoring the bill.

“We all pay a little bit and we all prosper a lot,” said Carl Guardino, CEO of the business group.

"The revenue would generate roughly $100 million annually for Caltrain," adds Murphy. Caltrain's fiscal year 2017 budget [pdf] is $146,392,029.

Caltrain will begin a $2 billion modernization project this summer, including electrification of the diesel-powered line that runs 92 trains daily. While electrification should decrease operating costs, the number of trains should increase greatly.

Too many sales taxes?

"The statewide sales tax is 7.25 percent, but many cities and counties have their only sales taxes," notes Murphy. "If voters in three Bay Area counties agree to increase the sales tax by an eighth of a cent to help fund Caltrain, this is what the new rates would be:"

Santa Clara County: 9.125 percent
San Mateo County: 8.875 percent.

San Francisco: 8.625 percent

Source: Board of Equalization

Competing transportation tax measure

Legislation authorizing another Bay Area transportation ballot measure, SB 595, also known as Regional Measure 3, would permit voters in all nine Bay Area counties to increase tolls on the seven state-owned Bay Area toll bridges (the Golden Gate Bridge not being one of them) by as much as 60 percent.

Presumably, but not necessarily, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, the administrative body behind RM 3, would work with the Caltrain board to ensure both measures do not appear on the same ballot should both bills become law and be approved by their governing bodies.

Thursday, June 22, 2017 in The Daily Journal

portrait of professional woman

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban Planner

Get top-rated, practical training

Wastewater pouring out from a pipe.

Alabama: Trump Terminates Settlements for Black Communities Harmed By Raw Sewage

Trump deemed the landmark civil rights agreement “illegal DEI and environmental justice policy.”

April 13, 2025 - Inside Climate News

Logo for Planetizen Federal Action Tracker with black and white image of U.S. Capitol with water ripple overlay.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

April 16, 2025 - Diana Ionescu

Bird's eye view of large apartment complex under construction next to four-lane road near Atlanta, Georgia.

How Atlanta Built 7,000 Housing Units in 3 Years

The city’s comprehensive, neighborhood-focused housing strategy focuses on identifying properties and land that can be repurposed for housing and encouraging development in underserved neighborhoods.

April 9, 2025 - Governing

People walking up and down stairs in New York City subway station.

In Both Crashes and Crime, Public Transportation is Far Safer than Driving

Contrary to popular assumptions, public transportation has far lower crash and crime rates than automobile travel. For safer communities, improve and encourage transit travel.

4 hours ago - Scientific American

White public transit bus with bike on front bike rack in Nashville, Tennessee.

Report: Zoning Reforms Should Complement Nashville’s Ambitious Transit Plan

Without reform, restrictive zoning codes will limit the impact of the city’s planned transit expansion and could exclude some of the residents who depend on transit the most.

5 hours ago - Bloomberg CityLab

An engineer controlling a quality of water ,aerated activated sludge tank at a waste water treatment plant.

Judge Orders Release of Frozen IRA, IIJA Funding

The decision is a victory for environmental groups who charged that freezing funds for critical infrastructure and disaster response programs caused “real and irreparable harm” to communities.

6 hours ago - Smart Cities Dive