Trump Open to Hiking Gas Tax to Fund Infrastructure Package

Like so many of the president's assertions, the statement, made in a Bloomberg interview on Monday morning, could be open to interpretation, but he's gone where none of his predecessors since Bill Clinton on the issue of raising the gas tax.

3 minute read

May 3, 2017, 10:00 AM PDT

By Irvin Dawid


Low Gas Prices

kabby / Shutterstock

When the issue of raising gas taxes arose at the start of the previous administration, President Obama made it clear that he would oppose raising the 18.4 cent per gallon federal gas tax, not increased since 1993 by President Bill Clinton. It violated his pledge not to raise taxes on the middle class.

While his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton, repeated that pledge, candidate Trump did not. In fact, as Politifact acknowledges, "15 of the 17 GOP candidates had signed no-tax-hike pledges - not just the middle class but everyone." Jeb Bush and Donald Trump were the exceptions.

Damian Paletta, White House economic policy reporter for The Washington Post, reports on the May 1 Bloomberg interview on the issue of hiking the gas tax.

“It’s something that I would certainly consider” [emphasis added], Bloomberg quoted Trump as saying. The president added that he would be inclined to back the idea “if we earmarked money toward the highways.”

Paletta adds that the context of the remark was funding Trump's much touted $1 trillion infrastructure plan, few details of which have been released.

Aides have said the package would be financed by roughly $200 billion in federal money, with the rest coming from private financing. But Trump has also suggested that he could back a plan that received only federal support.

Heretofore, "federal support" meant general fund transfers which would would either be offset, or added to the growing federal deficit. Private funding has been widely interpreted to mean that user fees, such as tolls, would have to be charged, which would rule out many projects, such as rural roads.

Hiking fuel taxes to pay for infrastructure would allow for public financing without need to offset or add to the deficit, and provides an alternative, or supplement to "tax credits for developers," which Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) has stated he would not support.

Polling in January showed that "66 percent of those surveyed said they oppose a plan that would grant close to $140 billion in tax credits to investors who put their money into roads, bridges and transit in return for the right to impose tolls." However, that poll didn't ask how respondents would view increasing gas taxes to pay for those investments.

In the interview, Trump pointed to support by truckers' groups for raising fuel taxes (yes, even diesel taxes) provided funds are used for road infrastructure.

Trump released a one-page tax plan on April 26 that was silent on a gas tax, write the Bloomberg reporters who conducted the interview. They add:

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said Monday afternoon that Trump isn’t specifically supporting an increase -- but the president is keeping an open mind about it “out of respect” for trucking-industry interests who Spicer said support an increase as a way to pay for needed road improvements.

Perhaps all this "consideration" was merely throwing a bone to the trucking industry, who are known to be staunch opponents of road tolls?

Monday, May 1, 2017 in The Washington Post - Wonkblog

portrait of professional woman

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban Planner

Get top-rated, practical training

High-rise apartment buildings in Waikiki, Hawaii with steep green mountains in background.

Study: Maui’s Plan to Convert Vacation Rentals to Long-Term Housing Could Cause Nearly $1 Billion Economic Loss

The plan would reduce visitor accommodation by 25,% resulting in 1,900 jobs lost.

April 6, 2025 - Honolulu Civil Beat

Two yellow and white Dallas Area Rapid Transit light rail streetcars at station in Dallas, Texas.

North Texas Transit Leaders Tout Benefits of TOD for Growing Region

At a summit focused on transit-oriented development, policymakers discussed how North Texas’ expanded light rail system can serve as a tool for economic growth.

April 3, 2025 - KERA News

Rusty abandoned oil well and equipment with prickly pear cactus next to it in West Texas.

Using Old Oil and Gas Wells for Green Energy Storage

Penn State researchers have found that repurposing abandoned oil and gas wells for geothermal-assisted compressed-air energy storage can boost efficiency, reduce environmental risks, and support clean energy and job transitions.

March 31, 2025 - Pennsylvania State University

Aerial view of Spanish revival style buildings with red tile roofs in downtown Santa Barbara, California.

Santa Barbara Could Build Housing on County Land

County supervisors moved forward a proposal to build workforce housing on two county-owned parcels.

6 hours ago - The Santa Barbara Independent

Green and white interstate freeway signs pointing to Hayward and San Mateo and Half Moon Bay exits in Northern California.

San Mateo Formally Opposes Freeway Project

The city council will send a letter to Caltrans urging the agency to reconsider a plan to expand the 101 through the city of San Mateo.

7 hours ago - Streetsblog San Francisco

Kingsbridge Armory, large hangar-like brick building in the Bronx, New York City with brick lower floors and glass/metal curved roof..

A Bronx Community Fights to Have its Voice Heard

After organizing and giving input for decades, the community around the Kingsbridge Armory might actually see it redeveloped — and they want to continue to have a say in how it goes.

April 9 - Shelterforce Magazine