Appeals Court Ruling Favors Trump—Strike Two Against Clean Power Plan

An appeals court on Friday granted the Trump Administration's request to suspend lawsuits on the Clean Power Plan, dealing a major blow against President Obama's signature climate initiative to reduce carbon emissions from existing plants.

2 minute read

May 2, 2017, 2:00 PM PDT

By Irvin Dawid


Pollution 2

Evanna Chung / Flickr

With the signing on March 28 of the president's executive order, "Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth," the rollback of the Clean Power Plan was set in motion. The first step was to "get permission from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, where the rule is tied up in litigation, to revisit the matter," notes the post on the signing of the order.

That critical step was taken by the court on April 28, when it stayed "litigation against the Environmental Protection Agency rule for 60 days," report  for The Washington Post.

Opponents of the Obama-era rule, which sought to impose the first-ever federal limits on existing power plants, hailed the decision.

“The D.C. Circuit has done the right thing,” David Rivkin, a constitutional lawyer who represented the 28 states that sued over the regulation, said in an interview. “It is indeed the death knell of the Clean Power Plan.

According to statements in the article by the Sierra Club and Environmental Defense Fund, both parties in the court case supporting the rule, all is not lost.

Eilperin and Dennis note some good news for the environmental community on a different regulation affecting power plant emissions. They note that the March 28 executive order also instructed EPA to rewrite the 2015 rule known as the “Carbon Pollution Standard for New Power Plants" and for Attorney General Jeff Sessions to ask the D.C. Circuit to suspend litigation against that rule. 

However, since the Supreme Court's emergency order in February 2016 did not suspend that rule, it remains in effect.

Correspondent's note: As Planetizen's editor posted in February, "Changes in Environmental Policy Already Apparent on the EPA Website," you, the reader, may soon become aware of them if you haven't already.

For example, EPA's link for the aforementioned "Carbon Pollution Standard for New Power Plants," introduced in 2013 and also described here, now directs readers to the March 28 Executive Order, which calls for a review of the Clean Power Plan, even though the rule remains in effect, as The Post's reporters explained. 

Sadly, Planetizen may need to rely on outside sources, like Wikipedia or the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES) – "an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit organization working to forge practical solutions to climate change," for explanations of EPA rules, such as the Carbon Pollution Standard for New Power Plants. But be forewarned, because links within C2ES' description direct readers to EPA sites that have been altered.

Friday, April 28, 2017 in The Washington Post - Energy and Environment

portrait of professional woman

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban Planner

Get top-rated, practical training

Wastewater pouring out from a pipe.

Alabama: Trump Terminates Settlements for Black Communities Harmed By Raw Sewage

Trump deemed the landmark civil rights agreement “illegal DEI and environmental justice policy.”

April 13, 2025 - Inside Climate News

Logo for Planetizen Federal Action Tracker with black and white image of U.S. Capitol with water ripple overlay.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

April 16, 2025 - Diana Ionescu

Blue and white Seattle Link light rail train exiting concrete Downtown Bellevue Tunnel in Bellevue, WA.

Why Should We Subsidize Public Transportation?

Many public transit agencies face financial stress due to rising costs, declining fare revenue, and declining subsidies. Transit advocates must provide a strong business case for increasing public transit funding.

April 7, 2025 - Todd Litman

Two people on bikes in red painted bike lane with bus in traffic lane next to them.

Understanding Road Diets

An explainer from Momentum highlights the advantages of reducing vehicle lanes in favor of more bike, transit, and pedestrian infrastructure.

April 17 - Momentum Magazine

Aerial view of large warehouses across from development of suburban single-family homes in Jurupa, California with desert mountains in background.

New California Law Regulates Warehouse Pollution

A new law tightens building and emissions regulations for large distribution warehouses to mitigate air pollution and traffic in surrounding communities.

April 17 - Black Voice News

Purple Phoenix light rail train connected to overhead wires at sunset.

Phoenix Announces Opening Date for Light Rail Extension

The South Central extension will connect South Phoenix to downtown and other major hubs starting on June 7.

April 17 - Arizona Republic