The Portland City Council moved quickly in proposing and revising a "street fee" to finance repairs on the city's crumbling roads. Now a more realistic calendar seems to be in place for considering the fee on residents and businesses.

Brad Schmidt reported on the details of the "street fee" (the Portland Bureau of Transportation's website calls it a "Transportation User Fee") when city officials announced the proposed charge on residents and businesses last week: "The 'transportation user fee' would cost the typical household $11.56 a month; poorer households would pay $8.09 a month and owners of apartment complexes would be charged $6.79 per unit, with a discount for multifamily complexes that cater to lower-income residents. Businesses and other government institutions, including city agencies and school districts, also would be charged."
According to the initial draft proposal for the fee, "at least 80 percent of revenue from the new fee would go for maintenance and safety improvements. Up to 20 percent could be spent on 'other transportation services,' including paving unimproved streets, mass transit and covering administrative costs."
Since the initial announcement, the City Council has quickly tweaked and prodded the fee. Schmidt wrote another article detailing the how and why of why the fee ended up on the fast track of the city's legislative agenda. The calendar for the fee has now changed, as have the details. Now, "instead of charging homeowners a monthly fee of $11.56 a month, the city would incrementally raise fees annually from $6 to $9 to $12." Moreover, "Residential fees wouldn't go into effect unless the city approves the proposed charges on business. Both sets of fees would begin July 1, 2015."
In yet another report, Andrew Theen provides a breakdown of how the revenue generated by the fee would be spent by the city.
FULL STORY: Portland street fee would cost typical household almost $140 a year

What ‘The Brutalist’ Teaches Us About Modern Cities
How architecture and urban landscapes reflect the trauma and dysfunction of the post-war experience.

‘Complete Streets’ Webpage Deleted in Federal Purge
Basic resources and information on building bike lanes and sidewalks, formerly housed on the government’s Complete Streets website, are now gone.

The VW Bus is Back — Now as an Electric Minivan
Volkswagen’s ID. Buzz reimagines its iconic Bus as a fully electric minivan, blending retro design with modern technology, a 231-mile range, and practical versatility to offer a stylish yet functional EV for the future.

Healing Through Parks: Altadena’s Path to Recovery After the Eaton Fire
In the wake of the Eaton Fire, Altadena is uniting to restore Loma Alta Park, creating a renewed space for recreation, community gathering, and resilience.

San Diego to Rescind Multi-Unit ADU Rule
The city wants to close a loophole that allowed developers to build apartment buildings on single-family lots as ADUs.

Electric Vehicles for All? Study Finds Disparities in Access and Incentives
A new UCLA study finds that while California has made progress in electric vehicle adoption, disadvantaged communities remain underserved in EV incentives, ownership, and charging access, requiring targeted policy changes to advance equity.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
City of Albany
UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies
Mpact (formerly Rail~Volution)
Chaddick Institute at DePaul University
City of Piedmont, CA
Great Falls Development Authority, Inc.
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research