Researchers are cataloging the costs of transit projects around the world in an attempt to identify ways to bring costs down and spend transit funding more efficiently.

In an article for Governing, Jared Brey describes the Transit Costs Project, which compares the costs of transit projects around the world to help identify and understand cost variations and how projects can become more cost-effective.
According to the project’s early findings, “The United States is the sixth most expensive country in the world when it comes to building rapid rail projects,” with reasons ranging “from the politicization of project management to the expanding role of consultants, the costs of labor, and efforts to limit disruption to normal traffic flow during construction.”
Governing spoke with project leader Eric Goldwyn, who said, “In the countries that are more expensive than the U.S., they’re building 65 percent or more of their projects underground, and in the U.S., we’re only building like 37 percent of our projects underground. So we’re choosing a less expensive method and we’re still very close to being the most expensive in the world.”
Goldwyn explains that long public review processes drive up costs simply due to inflation, while elaborate station plans also add to costs and reduce the number of stations that can be built under budget. High construction costs matter because they lead to drastically diminished transportation systems and fuel opposition to transit projects.
On what cities are doing right, Goldwyn says “The one thing we see is a heavy emphasis on standardization of design and really trying to economize as much as possible.” When it comes to labor costs, even cities with high worker pay rates can achieve low project costs through labor-saving technologies and other innovations. “It’s not about paying people less. It’s about, don’t spend as many hours doing something, and don’t use as many people to do that thing.”
FULL STORY: Why Are U.S. Transit Projects So Costly? This Group Is on the Case.

What ‘The Brutalist’ Teaches Us About Modern Cities
How architecture and urban landscapes reflect the trauma and dysfunction of the post-war experience.

‘Complete Streets’ Webpage Deleted in Federal Purge
Basic resources and information on building bike lanes and sidewalks, formerly housed on the government’s Complete Streets website, are now gone.

The VW Bus is Back — Now as an Electric Minivan
Volkswagen’s ID. Buzz reimagines its iconic Bus as a fully electric minivan, blending retro design with modern technology, a 231-mile range, and practical versatility to offer a stylish yet functional EV for the future.

Healing Through Parks: Altadena’s Path to Recovery After the Eaton Fire
In the wake of the Eaton Fire, Altadena is uniting to restore Loma Alta Park, creating a renewed space for recreation, community gathering, and resilience.

San Diego to Rescind Multi-Unit ADU Rule
The city wants to close a loophole that allowed developers to build apartment buildings on single-family lots as ADUs.

Electric Vehicles for All? Study Finds Disparities in Access and Incentives
A new UCLA study finds that while California has made progress in electric vehicle adoption, disadvantaged communities remain underserved in EV incentives, ownership, and charging access, requiring targeted policy changes to advance equity.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
City of Albany
UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies
Mpact (formerly Rail~Volution)
Chaddick Institute at DePaul University
City of Piedmont, CA
Great Falls Development Authority, Inc.
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research