The ability of the federal government to fund, and define, infrastructure, owes itself to a history of state and federal leadership at the dawn of the nation's existence.

Writing for The Washington Post, Susan Nagel tells the history of the intense rivalries between political leaders in New York (namely Philip Schuyler) and Virginia (namely George Washington) to control waterborne traffic from the Atlantic to the interior of North America.
The challenges of determining the scope of federal power to fund and build infrastructure, and what kinds of projects fell under that power, originates to Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, which "endowed Congress with the right to provide for national defense and regulate interstate commerce. But, explains, Nagel, "it did not grant Congress the explicit authority to fund what was then known as 'interior improvements' — or what today is called infrastructure."
Thus, the answers to questions of 1) what constituted infrastructure, 2) who was responsible for it, and 3) what role the federal government should play in developing fell politicians like George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and James Monroe.
Hanging in the balance back then was the funding of the Erie Canal, the location of Washington, D.C., and the navigability of the Potomac River hung in the balance. In the contemporary United States, the role of the federal government in funding and building infrastructure—and the definition of infrastructure—is again up for debate.
FULL STORY: A conflict among the Founders is still shaping infrastructure debates in 2021

What ‘The Brutalist’ Teaches Us About Modern Cities
How architecture and urban landscapes reflect the trauma and dysfunction of the post-war experience.

‘Complete Streets’ Webpage Deleted in Federal Purge
Basic resources and information on building bike lanes and sidewalks, formerly housed on the government’s Complete Streets website, are now gone.

The VW Bus is Back — Now as an Electric Minivan
Volkswagen’s ID. Buzz reimagines its iconic Bus as a fully electric minivan, blending retro design with modern technology, a 231-mile range, and practical versatility to offer a stylish yet functional EV for the future.

Healing Through Parks: Altadena’s Path to Recovery After the Eaton Fire
In the wake of the Eaton Fire, Altadena is uniting to restore Loma Alta Park, creating a renewed space for recreation, community gathering, and resilience.

San Diego to Rescind Multi-Unit ADU Rule
The city wants to close a loophole that allowed developers to build apartment buildings on single-family lots as ADUs.

Electric Vehicles for All? Study Finds Disparities in Access and Incentives
A new UCLA study finds that while California has made progress in electric vehicle adoption, disadvantaged communities remain underserved in EV incentives, ownership, and charging access, requiring targeted policy changes to advance equity.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
City of Albany
UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies
Mpact (formerly Rail~Volution)
Chaddick Institute at DePaul University
City of Piedmont, CA
Great Falls Development Authority, Inc.
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research