The beleaguered project is still very much alive, despite some media claims to the contrary. As for the Trump administration's claim to two grants awarded to the now-$77 billion project, the state has a deadline to meet if it wants to keep them.

Did California Governor Gavin Newsom (D) "dramatically downsize the high-speed rail project," as Planetizen and other outlets inferred from his first state-of-the-state address to lawmakers on Feb. 12?
Ben Adler, capitol bureau chief for Sacramento's NPR-affiliate, Capital Public Radio, provides much-needed answers to the status of the nation's largest mega-project based on interviews with four top officials in the governor’s office and Newsom administration.
Readers may wish to listen to the 2-minute tape of his piece, originally published on Feb. 14, and most importantly, updated on Feb. 21 to comment on the Federal Railroad Administration's attempt to recoup $3.5 billion awarded to the $77 billion project.
First, the San Francisco-to-Los Angeles project, as most people know it, wasn't actually downsized. "Don’t even say 'paused' or 'scaled back,'” as Adler writes below. Ponder the two most overlooked words in the governor's speech: "as planned."
“Let’s be real,” the governor told a joint session of the California Legislature on Tuesday. “The current project, as planned, would cost too much and, respectfully, take too long.”
Newsom continued:
“We’ll finish phase one of the environmental work,” Newsom announced, referring to the environmental review of that full segment. (To clarify: Phase one is the 520 mile, SF-to-Anaheim segment. The Central Valley stretch is a subsection of that larger segment.)
Click on this interactive map by the California High-Speed Rail Authority to understand project phases and project sections.
In other words, forget “canceled” or “abandoned.” Don’t even say “paused” or “scaled back.”
The most you can really say about the Bay Area-to-Anaheim stretch known as “Phase 1” is that it’s merely on the back burner for the time being.
Adler's updated article adds clarity to the Federal Railroad Administration's attempt to "cancel the $929 million in Federal grant funds yet to be paid for the California High-Speed Rail project (and) seek the return from California of $2.5 billion in Federal funds FRA previously granted..." [Also, see prior post.]
The money came with three strings attached:
- Spend the $2.55 billion in stimulus funds by September 2017. This requirement has been met [pdf].
- Complete environmental reviews on the full 520 mile San Francisco-to-Anaheim segment known as “Phase 1” by December 31, 2022. The High-Speed Rail Authority says it has “environmentally cleared” the 171-mile stretch from Merced to downtown Bakersfield called for by Newsom and is “progressing on the remaining project sections.”
- Complete construction on the 119-mile stretch from Madera to the outskirts of Bakersfield by December 31, 2022. That work is underway.
Bottom line: "The state has less than three years to finish all its environmental reviews and complete the 119 miles of track from Madera to northern Bakersfield," notes Adler. But the bottom line only holds for the Trump administration. The outlook could dramatically change depending on what happens on Nov. 3, 2020, as he notes below.
If Democrats win the White House and control of Congress in next year’s elections, high-speed rail funding could be right back on the table — at which point California will be ready to ask for new federal funding to keep building.
Related in Planetizen:
-
February 21, 2019
-
February 16, 2019
-
February 13, 2019
FULL STORY: No, Gavin Newsom Didn’t Just Kill California’s High-Speed Rail Project

Study: Maui’s Plan to Convert Vacation Rentals to Long-Term Housing Could Cause Nearly $1 Billion Economic Loss
The plan would reduce visitor accommodation by 25,% resulting in 1,900 jobs lost.

North Texas Transit Leaders Tout Benefits of TOD for Growing Region
At a summit focused on transit-oriented development, policymakers discussed how North Texas’ expanded light rail system can serve as a tool for economic growth.

Why Should We Subsidize Public Transportation?
Many public transit agencies face financial stress due to rising costs, declining fare revenue, and declining subsidies. Transit advocates must provide a strong business case for increasing public transit funding.

How Community Science Connects People, Parks, and Biodiversity
Community science engages people of all backgrounds in documenting local biodiversity, strengthening connections to nature, and contributing to global efforts like the City Nature Challenge to build a more inclusive and resilient future.

Alabama: Trump Terminates Settlements for Black Communities Harmed By Raw Sewage
Trump deemed the landmark civil rights agreement “illegal DEI and environmental justice policy.”

Dear Tesla Driver: “It’s not You, It’s Him.”
Amidst a booming bumper sticker industry, one writer offers solace to those asking, “Does this car make me look fascist?”
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
City of Santa Clarita
Ascent Environmental
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions
Salt Lake City
NYU Wagner Graduate School of Public Service