The Geary bus corridor was the #1 pick for a subway according to a Muni survey, but commuters will have to settle for bus rapid transit. A milestone was reached when the San Francisco County Transportation Authority approved the design and EIR.
"The Board of Supervisors, acting as the San Francisco County Transportation Authority, voted 10-0 with Supervisor Scott Wiener absent, to select a design that puts 1.7 miles of dedicated bus lanes in the median through the heart [see map] of the Richmond District," writes Michael Cabanatuan, transportation reporter for the San Francisco Chronicle.
The SFCTA commissioners also unanimously approved the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the project, named for the corridor on which it travels, Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit.
"Muni’s 38-Geary bus lines carry about 52,000 passengers a day," notes Cabanatuan, the highest ridership in the city, and "one of the most used bus lines in the United States," according to the Geary Corridor BRT fact sheet (PDF). The corridor was also top choice selected for a "new subway line in a recent survey conducted by the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA)," reported Amy Graff for The Chronicle last October.
First Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) project
In September 2013, the authority's board unanimously approved the Van Ness Avenue Bus Rapid Transit project and certified its Environmental Impact Report, "clearing the way for design and implementation," according to their joint press release with San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency [PDF]. Last month, that project received a federal infusion of $75 million in grant funds from the Federal Transit Administration.
Project marked by delay, more to come
A 2006 Planetizen post, also based on a report by Michael Cabanatuan in The Chronicle, predicted that service on both Van Ness and Geary BRT lines would be operating by 2010. But the Geary line is fiercely opposed by "merchants and residents who fear lost parking and increased congestion will drive away business," updates Cabanatuan.
[M]ore hearings, and votes, must still come before the Municipal Transportation Agency [SFMTA or Muni] can start building the $300 million faster bus rapid transit system, tentatively scheduled to start carrying passengers by 2021.
In an opinion piece in The Chronicle printed on Jan. 5, the day the SFCTA voted on the EIR, leaders of the Planning Association of the Richmond advocated an alternative design for the project based on an "incremental approach: more buses, tighter schedules, repaving, better synchronization of traffic lights, upgraded bus-driver controls to extend green lights briefly, fewer 'Rapid' stops and better stations."
Design

The rendering above shows a station stop and is not typical of the line. Best to click on video below to view the "hybrid solution" composed of side-running and center-running lanes, the latter mostly not being separated, as pictured above but "red-carpet", though still considered "dedicated."
=======================================
Related in Planetizen:
- Feds Put $75 Million Toward San Francisco BRT Project, December 29, 2016: The $223 million Van Ness Bus Rapid Transit project in San Francisco received a major cash infusion from the federal government this week.
- San Francisco To Implement Bus Rapid Transit Service By 2010, November 9, 2006: While late to adopt bus rapid transit, San Francisco's Muni is planning to bring fully-fledged BRT lines, complete with dedicated lanes, to the city by 2010.
FULL STORY: Upgrade of Muni’s Geary bus line moves forward

What ‘The Brutalist’ Teaches Us About Modern Cities
How architecture and urban landscapes reflect the trauma and dysfunction of the post-war experience.

‘Complete Streets’ Webpage Deleted in Federal Purge
Basic resources and information on building bike lanes and sidewalks, formerly housed on the government’s Complete Streets website, are now gone.

The VW Bus is Back — Now as an Electric Minivan
Volkswagen’s ID. Buzz reimagines its iconic Bus as a fully electric minivan, blending retro design with modern technology, a 231-mile range, and practical versatility to offer a stylish yet functional EV for the future.

Healing Through Parks: Altadena’s Path to Recovery After the Eaton Fire
In the wake of the Eaton Fire, Altadena is uniting to restore Loma Alta Park, creating a renewed space for recreation, community gathering, and resilience.

San Diego to Rescind Multi-Unit ADU Rule
The city wants to close a loophole that allowed developers to build apartment buildings on single-family lots as ADUs.

Electric Vehicles for All? Study Finds Disparities in Access and Incentives
A new UCLA study finds that while California has made progress in electric vehicle adoption, disadvantaged communities remain underserved in EV incentives, ownership, and charging access, requiring targeted policy changes to advance equity.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
City of Albany
UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies
Mpact (formerly Rail~Volution)
Chaddick Institute at DePaul University
City of Piedmont, CA
Great Falls Development Authority, Inc.
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research