As the housing market recovers, are we back to the McMansion-binges of the 2000s? Or, are we growing just a little bit smarter?
A few days ago the LA Times reported that, this October, residential construction permits topped one million for the first time in five years. That fits the narrative of a consistently improving housing market, but I wondered what was behind the numbers: were we back to the McMansion-binges of the 2000s, or were we growing just a little bit smarter?
With multi-family construction permits at a 27-year high (as a share of total residential permits), we're not doing half bad! In 2012, the last full year of data, multi-family residential construction permits accounted for the largest share of total permits issued since 1986. In 2012, 37.5% of new homes were multi-family units, yielding about 1.7 detached homes for every apartment or condo unit. That share reached its nadir in the early 1990s at under 17%—six single-family homes for every multi-family unit!—and held steady at around 25% until 2007:
Data from the US Census Bureau [1] [2]
The hope, at this point, is that that little tail emerging in 2013 doesn't continue its descent. If we build too many single-family homes now, a time may come where current owners can't find buyers. As the National Association of Realtors found in their annual report, the sprawling, suburban model probably can't sustain itself if it continues to account for more than 2/3 of overall growth. Even that may be a stretch in the not too distant future.
Here's the data based on the absolute number of building permits issued, rather than ratios (these are divided between single-family and 5+ unit buildings):
Data from the US Census Bureau [1] [2]
As you can see, construction of single-family homes grew consistently—and rather rapidly—from about 1991 to 2005. Over the next four years, it declined nearly 75%; multi-family construction fell nearly as much, though from a much smaller starting point. That peak in multi-family construction in the 1970s is pretty incredible, and I'd be curious to hear the reason behind it, if anyone knows anything about it.
The Census data from the last year also includes regional information:
Data from the US Census Bureau [1] [2]
Here you can see that the Northeast is leading the way in the share of multi-family housing being built, with just about one detached home for every condo or apartment. The South is, not surprisingly, building a lot of single-family homes. Its rapid growth accounts for over half of residential building permits in the country, so it skews the nationwide ratio pretty strongly in that direction.
As a side note, it's interesting to look at how construction of 2-, 3-, and 4-unit construction has changed over the years. Since the late 1950s, these building types accounted for at least 6% of total construction, peaking in the early 1980s at over 10%. Since then they've been on a steady decline, falling to almost 3% in recent years. No love for the lowly duplex these days, even with the uptick in multi-family construction.
Data from the US Census Bureau [1] [2]
And for anyone interested in a graph comparing single-family units to bigger multi-family (5+ unit) buildings, here you go. It accentuates the peaks a bit, but otherwise retains the same general shape as the first graph:

Manufactured Crisis: Losing the Nation’s Largest Source of Unsubsidized Affordable Housing
Manufactured housing communities have long been an affordable housing option for millions of people living in the U.S., but that affordability is disappearing rapidly. How did we get here?

Americans May Be Stuck — But Why?
Americans are moving a lot less than they once did, and that is a problem. While Yoni Applebaum, in his highly-publicized article Stuck, gets the reasons badly wrong, it's still important to ask: why are we moving so much less than before?

Using Old Oil and Gas Wells for Green Energy Storage
Penn State researchers have found that repurposing abandoned oil and gas wells for geothermal-assisted compressed-air energy storage can boost efficiency, reduce environmental risks, and support clean energy and job transitions.

Greening Oakland’s School Grounds
With help from community partners like the Trust for Public Land, Oakland Unified School District is turning barren, asphalt-covered schoolyards into vibrant, green spaces that support outdoor learning, play, and student well-being.

California Governor Suspends CEQA Reviews for Utilities in Fire Areas
Utility restoration efforts in areas affected by the January wildfires in Los Angeles will be exempt from environmental regulations to speed up the rebuilding of essential infrastructure.

Native American Communities Prepare to Lead on Environmental Stewardship
In the face of federal threats to public lands and conservation efforts, indigenous groups continue to model nature-centered conservation efforts.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Heyer Gruel & Associates PA
City of Moreno Valley
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Salt Lake City
NYU Wagner Graduate School of Public Service
City of Cambridge, Maryland
