Urban Parks: For Nature Or People?
After a devastating fire, competing visions emerge for restoring Los Angeles' Griffith Park, one of the largest urban parks in the nation.
"Should this be a people's park...a refuge for hikers, golfers, tai chi devotees and equestrians? Should it have more room for soccer players, softball teams and picnickers?
Or should one of the nation's largest urban parks evolve even more into a nature preserve, protected from people so that native wildlife and plants can thrive?"
"Some conservationists and scientists [see] a golden opportunity to restore much of the park's rugged interior to its once-wild state...Backers of that idea believe the fire did so much damage in part because nonnative species spread haphazardly for decades...Some argue that a park-poor city like Los Angeles cannot afford to entirely turn over the park to nature.
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related News Stories
Urban Railyard Finds New Life As Wetland Park - Apr 27, 2008
Plans For An Urban State Park Unveiled In L.A. - Oct 17, 2006
Southern California Restores Its Natural Past - Dec 11, 2005
Rare Show Of Unity on Growth Legislation in CA - Aug 13, 2008
Flaunting Lawn and Order With Astroturf - Aug 12, 2008






